[zeromq-dev] zerocopy

2018-05-23 Thread Benjamin Henrion
Hi, New zerocopy in Linux 4.18, I remember Luca did something at the latest hackaton: https://lwn.net/Articles/752188/ Best, -- Benjamin Henrion (zoobab) Email: zoobab at gmail.com Mobile: +32-484-566109 Web: http://www.zoobab.com FFII.org Brussels "In July 2005, after several failed attempts

Re: [zeromq-dev] zerocopy and PF_RING

2017-10-08 Thread Francesco
Great, ZeroMQ on DPDK sound really interesting! Hope to hear about that again in upcoming time :) Francesco 2017-10-06 20:45 GMT+02:00 Luca Boccassi : > On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 19:12 +0200, Francesco wrote: > > Hi all, > > just out of curiosity (since I see PF_RING

Re: [zeromq-dev] zerocopy and PF_RING

2017-10-06 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 19:12 +0200, Francesco wrote: > Hi all, > just out of curiosity (since I see PF_RING being mentioned), was DPDK > ever > took into account? > My company is now using DPDK for very-fast networking capture (let's > say in > 10-40Gbps range) and (very recently) adopted ZMQ for

Re: [zeromq-dev] zerocopy and PF_RING

2017-10-06 Thread Francesco
Hi all, just out of curiosity (since I see PF_RING being mentioned), was DPDK ever took into account? My company is now using DPDK for very-fast networking capture (let's say in 10-40Gbps range) and (very recently) adopted ZMQ for inter-software communication (much lower bandwidth)... while zeromq

[zeromq-dev] zerocopy and PF_RING

2017-10-06 Thread Benjamin Henrion
Hi, I see in the agenda of the hackaton that there is an item about zerocopy kernel API: http://zeromq.org/event:zeromq-pre-fosdem-hackaton-thu-1-fri-2-feb-2018 What about PF_RING? I have used curvetun: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/wily/man8/curvetun.8.html Which can do gigabit