Re: [zeta-dev] Proposal: Location component

2010-11-26 Thread Henri Bergius
Hi, On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: this component is currently GPL code. This is not compatible with the AL. Will this change? Are you the sole copyright holder for this component? Any code we submit to Zeta will of course have its copyrights

Re: [zeta-dev] Documenting our coding style

2010-11-26 Thread Derick Rethans
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Tobias Schlitt wrote: for another project I needed to give advice on the coding standard used by Apache Zeta Components. There is some very old version of the eZ Publish coding style in [1] (from 2001) but no reliable, recent source. So I think we should document our

Re: [zeta-dev] Proposal: Release process

2010-11-26 Thread Derick Rethans
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Tobias Schlitt wrote: I have studied the guidelines for releases in the ASF and tried to make up a release process document for us. Please find it attached for discussion. You can also find it in our SVN under docs/release_process.txt My comments: Component

Re: [zeta-dev] Proposal: Release process

2010-11-26 Thread Derick Rethans
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Tobias Schlitt wrote: On 11/07/2010 11:55 AM, Thomas Ernest wrote: Here comes questions : A/ What is your opinion about the proposal automate full package release ? B/ What are advantages of separating full package release process from component release process ?

Re: [zeta-dev] Proposal: Release process

2010-11-26 Thread Derick Rethans
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Tobias Schlitt wrote: Don't get me wrong, I insist of keeping our PEAR channel as the primary distribution way. Absolutely. Derick -- http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php twitter: @derickr and @xdebug

Re: [zeta-dev] Proposal: Release process

2010-11-26 Thread Derick Rethans
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Tobias Schlitt wrote: as far as I can see there are two major points in this discussion: 1. Providing updates for single components in short time frames could bring people to an update hell, when they need to download and upgrade some components every week. They don't

Re: [zeta-dev] Proposal: Location component

2010-11-26 Thread Derick Rethans
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Henri Bergius wrote: Spot A spot is an actual location on a map. This consists of WGS-84 latitude and longitude. Optionally spots may have an altitude, timestamp, accuracy and a human-readable description. You surely would like to call this a point instead? Also,

Re: [zeta-dev] Proposal: Location component

2010-11-26 Thread Derick Rethans
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Tobias Schlitt wrote: On 11/24/2010 01:03 PM, Henri Bergius wrote: Spot A spot is an actual location on a map. This consists of WGS-84 latitude and longitude. Optionally spots may have an altitude, timestamp, accuracy and a human-readable description.