On 19. aug. 2010, at 13.40, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> a friend of mine and I wrote a framework together. I have the strong
> feeling that PIWI should be based on ZC in near future since it offers
> solutions for much problems we have. Additionally ZC can help PIWI to
> concentrate
Hello everyone,
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 13:40 +0200, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
[...]
> However I would like to know if there has been a decision meanwhile on
> the prefix issue (see below). I would like to avoid to include ZC
> before this change has been done, if it is going to happen.
>
> My pre
> sounds interesting. We already started discussing a "framework"
> component a longer time ago in eZ Components. This component was meant
> to provide integration for the components, like scaffolding scripts.
> Having a complete framework on basis of Zeta would be a step in a
> similar direction.
Christian,
On 08/19/2010 01:40 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> a friend of mine and I wrote a framework together. I have the strong
> feeling that PIWI should be based on ZC in near future since it offers
> solutions for much problems we have. Additionally ZC can help PIWI to
> concentrate on it
Hello,
a friend of mine and I wrote a framework together. I have the strong
feeling that PIWI should be based on ZC in near future since it offers
solutions for much problems we have. Additionally ZC can help PIWI to
concentrate on its maingoal. Maybe there is a chance to pull out a few
classes, l
