Am 12.07.2010 16:45, schrieb Derick Rethans:
> Sure, sounds good.
+1
--
Sebastian BergmannCo-Founder and Principal Consultant
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://thePHP.cc/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> Therefore, I'd suggest that we map our old users to "xy-ez.no", so it is
> also clear that the commits were from eZ.
>
> Everyone ok with this idea?
Sure, sounds good.
Derick
--
http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org
Like Xdebug? Consider a do
+1
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> On 07/12/2010 03:54 PM, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
>
>> Therefore, I'd suggest that we map our old users to "xy-ez.no", so it is
>> also clear that the commits were from eZ.
>
> actu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 07/12/2010 03:54 PM, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> Therefore, I'd suggest that we map our old users to "xy-ez.no", so it is
> also clear that the commits were from eZ.
actually, I think "xy/ez.no" is better, so committer names don't get
confused wi
+1
Julien
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I was thinking about SVN user name mappings for when we import the eZ
> Components SVN into the ASF infrastructure. However, I don't think that
> mapping our old user nam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I was thinking about SVN user name mappings for when we import the eZ
Components SVN into the ASF infrastructure. However, I don't think that
mapping our old user names to the new ASF ones is a good idea, for two
reasons:
- - We can only map user
