[call for review] Keeping the eZ Publish Community in the loop
Dear everyone, I thought it would be wise to keep the eZ Publish Community in the loop, since they are likely to be the largest share of AZC users today. Here is a small blog-post, on which I would love to have your input : https://docs.google.com/a/ez.no/document/d/1SLuBI6HQqX_PJnswCOaV6MyW2AbOd0-1wTDwhHIf3f4/edit (anyone should be able to edit it, or make remarks through comments). I hope this fits you well and I am looking forward to your feedback ! -- Nicolas
Re: [call for review] Keeping the eZ Publish Community in the loop
The naming is completely undecided yet, we have contacted apache trademarks, since we don't know how to proceed. Also i agree with julien, the inactivity was the major reason to retire from ASF, since we couldnt follow procedure with quarterly reports anymore due to lack of time and didnt manage to get a first release under Apache flag out. The seperation of components into their own repositories are also done to seperate the maintained from the unmaintained ones more easily :-) On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Julien Vermillard jvermill...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Even if I think it's a good idea to keep the community in the loop I would like to remeber two points : - the zeta podling retirement vote was start due to lack of progress - if you want to use the Apache/ASF word you need to contact the Apache PR for that Julien On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Nicolas Pastorino n...@ez.no wrote: Dear everyone, I thought it would be wise to keep the eZ Publish Community in the loop, since they are likely to be the largest share of AZC users today. Here is a small blog-post, on which I would love to have your input : https://docs.google.com/a/ez.no/document/d/1SLuBI6HQqX_PJnswCOaV6MyW2AbOd0-1wTDwhHIf3f4/edit (anyone should be able to edit it, or make remarks through comments). I hope this fits you well and I am looking forward to your feedback ! -- Nicolas
Re: [call for review] Keeping the eZ Publish Community in the loop
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Benjamin Eberlei kont...@beberlei.de wrote: The naming is completely undecided yet, we have contacted apache trademarks, since we don't know how to proceed. I can confirm this has made its way into some private mailinglists and people are discussing it already. Cheers Also i agree with julien, the inactivity was the major reason to retire from ASF, since we couldnt follow procedure with quarterly reports anymore due to lack of time and didnt manage to get a first release under Apache flag out. The seperation of components into their own repositories are also done to seperate the maintained from the unmaintained ones more easily :-) On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Julien Vermillard jvermill...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Even if I think it's a good idea to keep the community in the loop I would like to remeber two points : - the zeta podling retirement vote was start due to lack of progress - if you want to use the Apache/ASF word you need to contact the Apache PR for that Julien On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Nicolas Pastorino n...@ez.no wrote: Dear everyone, I thought it would be wise to keep the eZ Publish Community in the loop, since they are likely to be the largest share of AZC users today. Here is a small blog-post, on which I would love to have your input : https://docs.google.com/a/ez.no/document/d/1SLuBI6HQqX_PJnswCOaV6MyW2AbOd0-1wTDwhHIf3f4/edit (anyone should be able to edit it, or make remarks through comments). I hope this fits you well and I am looking forward to your feedback ! -- Nicolas -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
Re: [call for review] Keeping the eZ Publish Community in the loop
@Christian thats good to know, i don't get mails back from the list i sent the naming question too. Its probably summed up and sent back to this list when final decision is made? On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Benjamin Eberlei kont...@beberlei.de wrote: The naming is completely undecided yet, we have contacted apache trademarks, since we don't know how to proceed. I can confirm this has made its way into some private mailinglists and people are discussing it already. Cheers Also i agree with julien, the inactivity was the major reason to retire from ASF, since we couldnt follow procedure with quarterly reports anymore due to lack of time and didnt manage to get a first release under Apache flag out. The seperation of components into their own repositories are also done to seperate the maintained from the unmaintained ones more easily :-) On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Julien Vermillard jvermill...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Even if I think it's a good idea to keep the community in the loop I would like to remeber two points : - the zeta podling retirement vote was start due to lack of progress - if you want to use the Apache/ASF word you need to contact the Apache PR for that Julien On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Nicolas Pastorino n...@ez.no wrote: Dear everyone, I thought it would be wise to keep the eZ Publish Community in the loop, since they are likely to be the largest share of AZC users today. Here is a small blog-post, on which I would love to have your input : https://docs.google.com/a/ez.no/document/d/1SLuBI6HQqX_PJnswCOaV6MyW2AbOd0-1wTDwhHIf3f4/edit (anyone should be able to edit it, or make remarks through comments). I hope this fits you well and I am looking forward to your feedback ! -- Nicolas -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
Re: [call for review] Keeping the eZ Publish Community in the loop
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Benjamin Eberlei kont...@beberlei.de wrote: @Christian thats good to know, i don't get mails back from the list i sent the naming question too. Its probably summed up and sent back to this list when final decision is made? If not, Julien and I are both subscribed to the relevant lists and we will come back to you with information. But actually I expect you get a direct response from the Trademarks Officer. Cheers Christian On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Benjamin Eberlei kont...@beberlei.de wrote: The naming is completely undecided yet, we have contacted apache trademarks, since we don't know how to proceed. I can confirm this has made its way into some private mailinglists and people are discussing it already. Cheers Also i agree with julien, the inactivity was the major reason to retire from ASF, since we couldnt follow procedure with quarterly reports anymore due to lack of time and didnt manage to get a first release under Apache flag out. The seperation of components into their own repositories are also done to seperate the maintained from the unmaintained ones more easily :-) On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Julien Vermillard jvermill...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Even if I think it's a good idea to keep the community in the loop I would like to remeber two points : - the zeta podling retirement vote was start due to lack of progress - if you want to use the Apache/ASF word you need to contact the Apache PR for that Julien On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Nicolas Pastorino n...@ez.no wrote: Dear everyone, I thought it would be wise to keep the eZ Publish Community in the loop, since they are likely to be the largest share of AZC users today. Here is a small blog-post, on which I would love to have your input : https://docs.google.com/a/ez.no/document/d/1SLuBI6HQqX_PJnswCOaV6MyW2AbOd0-1wTDwhHIf3f4/edit (anyone should be able to edit it, or make remarks through comments). I hope this fits you well and I am looking forward to your feedback ! -- Nicolas -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
