On Wednesday 24 January 2007 00:04, eric kustarz wrote:
> Right, i would verify your locks are working correctly (especially
> make sure atomic_add_64() is truly atomic). Note, these locks are in
> the ARC - so they are not in the VFS.
Yes, atomic_add_64() should be truly atomic, since I've taken
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 19:01, Ricardo Correia wrote:
> My current code is tripping the following assertion:
> lib/libzpool/build-kernel/arc.c:736: arc_change_state: Assertion
> `new_state->size + to_delta >= new_state->lsize (0x2a6 >= 0x2a64000)`
> failed.
(snip)
> (gdb) print new_state->
Hi,
My current code is tripping the following assertion:
lib/libzpool/build-kernel/arc.c:736: arc_change_state: Assertion
`new_state->size + to_delta >= new_state->lsize (0x2a6 >= 0x2a64000)`
failed.
gdb info:
Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
#0 0x2afcd767847b in raise () fr
Ricardo Correia wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 January 2007 00:04, eric kustarz wrote:
>> Right, i would verify your locks are working correctly (especially
>> make sure atomic_add_64() is truly atomic). Note, these locks are in
>> the ARC - so they are not in the VFS.
>
> Yes, atomic_add_64() should b
On Jan 23, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Ricardo Correia wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 January 2007 19:01, Ricardo Correia wrote:
>> My current code is tripping the following assertion:
>> lib/libzpool/build-kernel/arc.c:736: arc_change_state: Assertion
>> `new_state->size + to_delta >= new_state->lsize (0x2a6
