I dont like an incompatibility. In my POW, compatibility is essential. I would
prefer to loose some functions in ARM version of ZFS, instead of loosing entire
compatibility
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Richard Elling wrote:
> I think this reveals a more interesting challenge. If the on-disk format
> changes when we add features, and feature additions are represented
> by incrementing the version, then we might create a reason to fork.
> Perhaps we should look at having an implemented features li
I think this reveals a more interesting challenge. If the on-disk format
changes when we add features, and feature additions are represented
by incrementing the version, then we might create a reason to fork.
Perhaps we should look at having an implemented features list instead?
For example, if CZ
I notice from the release notes that ZFS has been changed in an
incompatible way. This concerns me deeply and I hope that the ARM
porting team can be convinced to reverse this change to ensure that the
ZFS in the ARM port is fully on disk compatible with the SPARC, Intel,
etc ports of ZFS on O
