Chris Kirby wrote:
> Ah, OK, I didn't catch the distinction between the keys.
>
> So is it possible for a snapshot to have a different unwrapping key
> than the head dataset? I would think not, since the blocks in a snapshot
> were created as part of the head ds.
A snapshot always has the same u
Chris Kirby wrote:
> Darren J Moffat wrote:
>> I've noticed that the dsl_dataset_t that points to a given dataset
>> changes during the life time of a 'zfs create' command. We start out
>> with one dsl_dataset_t* during dmu_objset_create_sync() but by the
>> time we are later mounting the datas
I've noticed that the dsl_dataset_t that points to a given dataset
changes during the life time of a 'zfs create' command. We start out
with one dsl_dataset_t* during dmu_objset_create_sync() but by the time
we are later mounting the dataset we have a different in memory
dsl_dataset_t* referri
Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Chris Kirby wrote:
>> Darren J Moffat wrote:
>>> I've noticed that the dsl_dataset_t that points to a given dataset
>>> changes during the life time of a 'zfs create' command. We start out
>>> with one dsl_dataset_t* during dmu_objset_create_sync() but by the
>>> time w
Darren J Moffat wrote:
> I've noticed that the dsl_dataset_t that points to a given dataset
> changes during the life time of a 'zfs create' command. We start out
> with one dsl_dataset_t* during dmu_objset_create_sync() but by the time
> we are later mounting the dataset we have a different in
