Hi
I'm sitting here for hours now and tried to mirror my rpool. nothing worked.
I have 2008.11 installed
when I try
zpool attach rpool c4t0d0s0 c4t1d0s0
I get - cannot open /dev/dsk/c4t1d0s0: I/O error
if i try
zpool attach rpool c4t0d0 c4t1d0
I get c4t1d0 EFI labeled devices are
Michael Widmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm sitting here for hours now and tried to mirror my rpool. nothing worked.
>
> I have 2008.11 installed
>
> when I try
>
> zpool attach rpool c4t0d0s0 c4t1d0s0
>
> I get - cannot open /dev/dsk/c4t1d0s0: I/O error
>
> if i try
> zpool attach rpool c4t0d0 c
On 04/13/09 12:53, Michael Widmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm sitting here for hours now and tried to mirror my rpool. nothing worked.
>
> I have 2008.11 installed
>
> when I try
>
> zpool attach rpool c4t0d0s0 c4t1d0s0
>
> I get - cannot open /dev/dsk/c4t1d0s0: I/O error
>
make sure that thi
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 09:07:31AM -0700, paul wrote:
> Nice.
>
> As a minor thought with respect to naming conventions, as most
> aren't likely to bother attempting to understand the relative merits
> of available checksum implementations, I can't help but wonder
> if the naming conventions shoul
Nice analysis. I understand you've found on the processor/memory-subsystem
architecture you've experimented with, that if the data being summed isn't
already cached, it's access will likely dominate it's use in calculations:
- Although this makes sense (presuming no mechanism may used to pre-cac
