Moore, Joe writes:
Louwtjie Burger wrote:
Richard Elling wrote:
- COW probably makes that conflict worse
This needs to be proven with a reproducible, real-world
workload before it
makes sense to try to solve it. After all, if we cannot
measure where
In order to be reasonably representative of a real-world situation, I'd suggest
the following additions:
1) create a large file (bigger than main memory) on
an empty ZFS pool.
1a. The pool should include entire disks, not small partitions (else seeks
will be artificially short).
1b. The
Hi,
I would like to offline an entire storage pool (not some devices),
( I want to stop all io activity to the pool)
Maybe it could be implemented with a
a command like :
zpool offline -f tank
which should implicity do a zfs unmount tank
I use zfs with solaris 10 update 4.
Thanks,
Ben
On Nov 21, 2007 10:09 AM, Ben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to offline an entire storage pool (not some devices),
( I want to stop all io activity to the pool)
How is this different from 'zpool export tank'?
Will
___
zfs-discuss mailing
I'm guessing that if you could offline the pool you'd still see it listed in
zpool status. Other than that I can't think of a reason.
- Original Message -
From: Will Murnane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ben [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007
BillTodd wrote:
In order to be reasonably representative of a real-world
situation, I'd suggest the following additions:
Your suggestions (make the benchmark big enough so seek times are really
noticed) are good. I'm hoping that over the holidays, I'll get to play
with an extra server...
On Nov 21, 2007 10:37 AM, Lion, Oren-P64304 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently tweaked Oracle (8K blocks, log_buffer gt 2M) on a Solaris
Oracle here is setup as 16K and 2G log buffer.
I am using a testpool with raid0 of 6 10K RPM FC disks (2 from each of
3 trays).
I played with 16K and 32K
...
This needs to be proven with a reproducible,
real-world workload before it
makes sense to try to solve it. After all, if we
cannot measure where
we are,
how can we prove that we've improved?
Ah - Tests Measurements types: you've just gotta love 'em.
Wife: Darling, is there really
Hello All-
I'm working on a Sun Ultra 80 M2 workstation. It has eight 750 GB SATA disks
installed. I've tried the following on both ON build 72, Solaris 10 update 4,
and Indiana with the same results.
If I create a ZFS filesystem using 1-7 hard drives (I've tried 1 and 7), and
then try to
Here is one issue I am running into when setting up a new NFS server to share
several zfs file systems.
I created following zfs file system from a zfs pool called bigpool. The bigpool
is the top level file system and mounted as /export/bigpool.
file system mount point
OK, I'll bite; it's not like I'm getting an answer to my other question.
Bill, please explain why deciding what to do about sequential scan
performance in ZFS is urgent?
ie why it's urgent rather than important (I agree that if it's bad
then it's going to be important eventually).
ie
This bug is still not integrated? To upgrade to a community release I still
have to patch and compile the kernel? How can this bug fix be integrated with
the code?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
John,
I'm working on a Sun Ultra 80 M2 workstation. It has eight 750 GB
SATA disks installed. I've tried the following on both ON build 72,
Solaris 10 update 4, and Indiana with the same results.
If I create a ZFS filesystem using 1-7 hard drives (I've tried 1
and 7), and then try to
Hello All,
Is any of the following available in ZFS, or is there any plan to add it?
- persistent atomic-inc/atomic-dec of a group of bytes in a file?
- LL/SC or Compare-and-swap of a group of bytes in a file, or a whole
file
- multiple renames, where:
- all or none of them
I have pool called data.
I have zones configured in that pool. The zonepath is: /data/zone1/fs.
(/data/zone1 itself is not used for anything else, by anyone, and has no other
data.) There are no datasets being delegated to this zone.
I want to create a snapshot that I would want to make
I'm going to combine three posts here because they all involve jcone:
First, as to my message heading:
The 'search forum' mechanism can't find his posts under the 'jcone' name (I was
curious, because they're interesting/strange, depending on how one looks at
them). I've also noticed (once in
Anil Jangity wrote:
I have pool called data.
I have zones configured in that pool. The zonepath is: /data/zone1/fs.
(/data/zone1 itself is not used for anything else, by anyone, and has no
other data.) There are no datasets being delegated to this zone.
I want to create a snapshot that I
Hi Bill,
Yes, that covers all of my selfish questions, thanks.
The B-trees I'm used to tree divide in arbitrary places across the whole
key, so doing partial-key queries is painful.
I can't find Structured File System Transarc usefully in Google. Do
you have a link handy? If not, never
Anil Jangity wrote:
I have pool called data.
I have zones configured in that pool. The zonepath is: /data/zone1/fs.
(/data/zone1 itself is not used for anything else, by anyone, and has no
other data.) There are no datasets being delegated to this zone.
I want to create a snapshot that
Thanks James/John!
That link specifically mentions new Solaris 10 release, so I am assuming that
means going from like u4 to Sol 10 u5, and that shouldn't cause a problem when
doing plain patchadd's (w/o live upgrade). If so, then I am fine with those
warnings and can use zfs with zones' path.
James C. McPherson wrote:
Anil Jangity wrote:
I have pool called data.
I have zones configured in that pool. The zonepath is: /data/zone1/fs.
(/data/zone1 itself is not used for anything else, by anyone, and has no
other data.) There are no datasets being delegated to this zone.
I want
Ian Collins wrote:
...
I don't know if anything else breaks when you do this, but if you are
building software in a zone on a lofs filesystem, dmake hangs. Regular
make works fine.
The output from truss is:
stat64(/export/home, 0x08045B60) = 0
llseek(8, 0, SEEK_CUR) = 0
llseek(8, 0,
James C. McPherson wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
...
I don't know if anything else breaks when you do this, but if you are
building software in a zone on a lofs filesystem, dmake hangs. Regular
make works fine.
The output from truss is:
stat64(/export/home, 0x08045B60) = 0
llseek(8, 0,
Ian Collins wrote:
James C. McPherson wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
...
I don't know if anything else breaks when you do this, but if you are
building software in a zone on a lofs filesystem, dmake hangs. Regular
make works fine.
The output from truss is:
stat64(/export/home, 0x08045B60) =
grew tired of the recycled 32bit cpus in
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=127555
and bought this to put the two marvell88sx cards in:
$255 http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon3000/3210/X7SBE.cfm
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 11:39:30AM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 11:10:20AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/20/2007 10:11:50 AM:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:01:49AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Resilver and scrub are broken and
The B-trees I'm used to tree divide in arbitrary
places across the whole
key, so doing partial-key queries is painful.
While the b-trees in DEC's Record Management Services (RMS) allowed
multi-segment keys, they treated the entire key as a byte-string as far as
prefix searches went (i.e.,
27 matches
Mail list logo
