Re: [zfs-discuss] Removing An Errant Drive From Zpool

2008-01-16 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Ben, Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 5:29:57 AM, you wrote: BR Eric Schrock wrote: There's really no way to recover from this, since we don't have device removal. However, I'm suprised that no warning was given. There are at least two things that should have happened: 1. zpool(1M)

Re: [zfs-discuss] Removing An Errant Drive From Zpool

2008-01-16 Thread Ben Rockwood
Robert Milkowski wrote: If you can't re-create a pool (+backuprestore your data) I would recommend to wait for device removal in zfs and in a mean time I would attach another drive to it so you've got mirrored configuration and remove them once there's a device removal. Since you're already

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS versus VxFS as file system inside Netbackup 6.0 DSSU

2008-01-16 Thread Paul Kraus
Previous posts from various people: But ... NBU (at least version 6.0) attempts to estimate the size of the backup and make suer there is enough room on the DSSU to handle it. What happens when the free space reported by ZFS isn't really the free space ? Regarding the

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS versus VxFS as file system inside Netbackup 6.0 DSSU

2008-01-16 Thread Selim Daoud
unfortunately in this area, Symantec is not helping anyone. they even take their time to officially include zfs in their compatibility lists s- On Jan 16, 2008 1:26 PM, Paul Kraus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Previous posts from various people: But ... NBU (at least version 6.0)

[zfs-discuss] zfs comparison

2008-01-16 Thread Agile Aspect
Hi - I'm new to ZFS but not to Solaris. Is there a search able interface to the zfs-discuss mail archives? We have a Windows 2003 Cluster with 200 TB SAN running under Active Directory with file system compression. Half the population is running Linux and the other half is running Windows XP.