On Monday 14 July 2008 08:29, Akhilesh Mritunjai wrote:
Writable snapshots are called clones in zfs. So infact, you have
trees of snapshots and clones. Snapshots are read-only, and you can
create any number of writable clones from a snapshot, that behave
like a normal filesystem and you can
Robert Milkowski wrote:
During christmass I managed to add my own compression to zfs - it as quite
easy.
Great to see innovation but unless your personal compression method is somehow
better (very fast with excellent
compression) then would it not be a better idea to use an existing
I got overzealous with snapshot creation. Every 5 mins is a bad idea. Way too
many.
What's the easiest way to delete the empty ones?
zfs list takes FOREVER
You might enjoy reading:
ZFS snapshot massacre
http://blogs.sun.com/chrisg/entry/zfs_snapshot_massacre.
(Yes, the . is part of the URL
r == Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
r the benefit of mirroring that CF drive would be minimal.
rather short-sighted. What if you want to replace the CF with a
bigger or faster one without shutting down?
pgpSx47yLusSx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-Peter Tribble wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
I have eight 10GB drives.
...
I have 6 remaining 10 GB drives and I desire to
raid 3 of them and mirror them to the other 3 to
give me raid security and integrity with mirrored
drive performance. I then want to move my
Also http://blogs.sun.com/chrisg/entry/a_faster_zfs_snapshot_massacre which I
run every night. Lots of snapshots are not a bad thing it is keeping them for
a long time that takes space. I'm still snapping every 10 minutes and it is
great.
The thing I discovered was that I really wanted to
Is there an optimal method of making a complete copy of a ZFS, aside from the
conventional methods (tar, cpio)?
We have an existing ZFS that was not created with the optimal recordsize.
We wish to create a new ZFS with the optimal recordsize (8k), and copy
all the data from the existing ZFS to
2008/7/20 James Mauro [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there an optimal method of making a complete copy of a ZFS, aside from the
conventional methods (tar, cpio)?
We have an existing ZFS that was not created with the optimal recordsize.
We wish to create a new ZFS with the optimal recordsize (8k), and
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Miles Nordin wrote:
r == Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
r the benefit of mirroring that CF drive would be minimal.
rather short-sighted. What if you want to replace the CF with a
bigger or faster one without shutting down?
Assuming that you are using zfs root,
Rob Clark wrote:
-Peter Tribble wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
I have eight 10GB drives.
...
I have 6 remaining 10 GB drives and I desire to
raid 3 of them and mirror them to the other 3 to
give me raid security and integrity with mirrored
drive
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Mattias Pantzare wrote:
Is there a ZFS-specific method for doing that beats the heck of out tar, etc?
(RTFM indicates there is not; I R'd the FM :^).
Use zfs send | zfs receive if you wish to keep your snapshots or if
you will be doing the copy several times. You can
So I'm really exposing my ignorance here, but...
You wrote /... if you wish to keep your snapshots.../...
I never mentioned snapshots, thus you
introduced the use of a ZFS snapshot as a method of doing what
I wish to do. And yes, snapshots and send are in the manual, and
I read about them.
I
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 10:28 -0700, Jürgen Keil wrote:
I ran a scrub on a root pool after upgrading to snv_94, and got checksum
errors:
Hmm, after reading this, I started a zpool scrub on my mirrored pool,
on a system that is running post snv_94 bits: It also found checksum errors
#
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:26:16 -0700
Bill Sommerfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
once is accident. twice is coincidence. three times is enemy
action :-)
I have no access to b94 yet, but as it is, it probably is better to
skip this one when it comes out then.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key:
ZFS Administration Guide (in PDF format) does not
look very professional (at least on
Evince/OS2008.05). Please see attached screenshot.
Looks like this is a display problem. It seems that certain fonts (monospace
fonts) were not displayed by the version of Evince included in OS 2008.05.
Jim Mauro wrote:
So I'm really exposing my ignorance here, but...
You wrote /... if you wish to keep your snapshots.../...
I never mentioned snapshots, thus you
introduced the use of a ZFS snapshot as a method of doing what
I wish to do. And yes, snapshots and send are in the manual, and
I
On Monday 14 July 2008 08:29, Akhilesh Mritunjai
wrote:
Writable snapshots are called clones in zfs. So
infact, you have
trees of snapshots and clones. Snapshots are
read-only, and you can
create any number of writable clones from a
snapshot, that behave
like a normal filesystem and
Evince likes to fuzz a number of PDFs. I too can't seem to nail the problems,
but it seems that a number of PDFs from SUN have this problem (very wrong
character spacing), and they all have been generated using FrameMaker. PDFs
generated using TeX/LaTeX are *usually* ok.
This message posted
18 matches
Mail list logo
