James,
Thanks a lot for your answer and for your presentation. I will read it
before making the activation of mpxio.
Thanks !
Kind regards.
Pierre.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: maandag 18 augustus 2008 22:49
To: Dony Pierre
Cc:
From what I can predict, and *nobody* has provided
any panic
essages to confirm, ZFS likely had difficulty
writing. For Solaris 10u5
Panic stack is looking pretty much the same as panic on imprt, and cannot be
correlated to write failure:
Aug 5 12:01:27 omases11 unix: [ID 836849
Hi John,
I like this idea - it would be clear solution for the problem.
Is it possible to manage custom parameters with standard CLI
commands (these are used by the installer for manipulating ZFS
entities) - zpool(1M), zfs(1M), ... ?
I am asking, since I haven't found information about setting
You may also need to just boot to safe mode and manually import the root
pool to mount on /a, then reboot as this updates the device path stored in
the pool's on-disk meta-data. If you search for my posts you will find
plenty discussions about my adventures with this.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at
Hi Robert, et.al.,
I have blogged about a method I used to recover a removed file from a
zfs file system
at http://mbruning.blogspot.com.
Be forewarned, it is very long...
All comments are welcome.
max
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello max,
Sunday, August 17, 2008, 1:02:05 PM, you wrote:
mbc A
jan damborsky wrote:
Hi John,
I like this idea - it would be clear solution for the problem.
Is it possible to manage custom parameters with standard CLI
commands (these are used by the installer for manipulating ZFS
entities) - zpool(1M), zfs(1M), ... ?
I am asking, since I haven't
Ian Collins wrote:
Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
I have a pretty standard ZFS boot AMD64 desktop. A the moment, most ZFS
related commands are hanging (can't be killed) . Running 'truss share'
the last few lines I see are:
Can you provide a kernel thread list report? You can
We do this all the time SRDF with zfs. Zones built on R!-R2 pairs as are the
application disks. Fast failover and some intelligence with scripts checking
that a resync has been completed before we failback.
v
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Perhaps user properties on pools would be useful here? At present only ZFS
filesystems can have user properties - not pools. Not really an immediate
solution to your problem though.
Cheers
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Hi Darren,
thank you very much for your help.
Please see my comments below.
Jan
Darren J Moffat wrote:
jan damborsky wrote:
Hi John,
I like this idea - it would be clear solution for the problem.
Is it possible to manage custom parameters with standard CLI
commands (these are used by the
Hi Andrew,
this is what I am thinking about based on John's
and Darren's responses.
I will file RFE for having possibility to set user
properties for pools (if it doesn't already exist).
Thank you,
Jan
andrew wrote:
Perhaps user properties on pools would be useful here? At present only ZFS
jan damborsky wrote:
zfs set caiman:install=preparing rpool/ROOT
That sounds reasonable. It is not atomic operation from installer
point of view, but the time window is really short (installer can
set ZFS user property almost immediately after pool is created).
Not it isn't but this
Darren J Moffat wrote:
jan damborsky wrote:
zfs set caiman:install=preparing rpool/ROOT
That sounds reasonable. It is not atomic operation from installer
point of view, but the time window is really short (installer can
set ZFS user property almost immediately after pool is created).
This panic message seems consistent with bugid 6322646, which was
fixed in NV b77 (post S10u5 freeze).
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6322646
-- richard
Borys Saulyak wrote:
From what I can predict, and *nobody* has provided
any panic
essages to confirm, ZFS
Darren J Moffat wrote:
jan damborsky wrote:
Hi John,
I like this idea - it would be clear solution for the problem.
Is it possible to manage custom parameters with standard CLI
commands (these are used by the installer for manipulating ZFS
entities) - zpool(1M), zfs(1M), ... ?
I am
Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
Joe Blount wrote:
Is the acl_t intentionally designed to be opaque?
Yes, its meant to be opaque.
The layout of the acl_t will likely change in the not too distant
future.
Will old versions be supported? For example, if ADM
Borys Saulyak wrote:
May I remind you that I issue occurred on Solaris 10, not on OpenSolaris.
I believe you. If you review the life cycle of a bug,
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hubs/documentation/patch/patch-docs/abugslife.pdf
then you will recall that bugs are fixed in NV and then
Just tried with a fresh install from the OpenSolaris 2008.11 snv_95 CD and it
works fine.
Thanks
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi all,
I'm a total newbie to Solaris administration. Please be patient.
I would like to get your opinion on what is the best way to setup the
machine using ZFS on all drives and partitions. I want to use Zones,
Live Upgrade and Virtualbox in the future.
The machine is SUN Ultra 40 M2 with
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 08:15:56PM -0600, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
We are currently investigating adding more functionality to libsec to
provide many of the things you desire. We will have iterators, editing
capabilities and so on.
I'm still ironing a design/architecture document out. I'll
I had recently got the mirroring part of it resolved.
Here's the steps I took:
http://malsserver.blogspot.com/2008/08/mirroring-resolved-correct-way.html
Malachi
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Ivan Ordonez
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a total newbie to Solaris administration.
Hello,
Thanks for your help. I will give it a shot. Does anyone know how can
I make the filesystem ZFS instead of the default UFS?
Thanks,
-Ivan
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 10:40, Malachi de Ælfweald wrote:
I had recently got the mirroring part of it resolved.
Here's the steps I took:
Hi Ivan,
If you are asking how you can make a ZFS root file system on a Solaris
10 system, then you'll need to wait a bit until that release is
available.
This features is currently provided in the SXCE, build 90 release,
which provides similar support. You can read more about this support
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Ivan Ordonez wrote:
I would like to get your opinion on what is the best way to setup the
machine using ZFS on all drives and partitions. I want to use Zones,
Live Upgrade and Virtualbox in the future.
The machine is SUN Ultra 40 M2 with 6G of RAM, 2 dual core AMD CPU,
Thanks to all of you for the help.
-Ivan
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 10:56, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Ivan Ordonez wrote:
I would like to get your opinion on what is the best way to setup the
machine using ZFS on all drives and partitions. I want to use Zones,
Live Upgrade
Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 08:15:56PM -0600, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
We are currently investigating adding more functionality to libsec to
provide many of the things you desire. We will have iterators, editing
capabilities and so on.
I'm still ironing a
Has anyone here had any luck using a CF to SATA adapter?
I've just tried an Addonics ADSACFW CF to SATA adaptor with an 8GB card that I
wanted to use for a boot pool and even though the BIOS reports the disk,
Solaris B95 (or the installer) doesn't see it.
I might give the IDE version a go (I
27 matches
Mail list logo
