(As I'm not subscribed to this list, you can keep me in CC:, but I'll check out
the Jive thread)
Hi all,
I've seen this questions asked several times, but there wasn't any solution
provided.
I'm trying to offline a faulted device in a RAID-Z2 device on Solaris 10. This
is done according to the
You're getting confused between snapshots and filesystems. Read @ as "at",
it's a snapshot of that filesystem at a particular point in time. eg, you
could create snapshots with names like:
z1/proje...@now
z1/proje...@13-july-2009
z1/proje...@my-snapshot
They're all snapshots of the z1/project
On Jul 12, 2009, at 11:45 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Reading various bits of google output about send/receive I'm starting
to wonder if that process is maybe the wrong way to go at what I want
to do.
I have a filesystem z1/projects I want to remove it from the z1 pool
and put it in a z2 pool end
Harry Putnam wrote:
Reading various bits of google output about send/receive I'm starting
to wonder if that process is maybe the wrong way to go at what I want
to do.
I have a filesystem z1/projects I want to remove it from the z1 pool
and put it in a z2 pool ending up with z2/projects. With a
Reading various bits of google output about send/receive I'm starting
to wonder if that process is maybe the wrong way to go at what I want
to do.
I have a filesystem z1/projects I want to remove it from the z1 pool
and put it in a z2 pool ending up with z2/projects. With all the same
data, same
Bob,
Output of my run for you. System is a M3000 with 16 GB RAM and 1 zpool
called test1
which is contained on a raid 1 volume on a 6140 with 7.50.13.10 firmware on
the RAID controllers. RAid 1 is made up of two 146GB 15K FC disks.
This machine is brand new with a clean install of S10 05/09. I
Thanks Tim
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Tertius Lydgate wrote:
Figure out how to mirror a root pool on one USB stick to another. It gives me the error
"new device must be a single disk" even though the new device is a single disk.
IIRC, you will get this error message if you try to "zpool add"
rather than "zpool attach" the disk
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:42:02 PDT, Tertius Lydgate
wrote:
>Figure out how to mirror a root pool on one USB stick to another.
>It gives me the error "new device must be a single disk"
>even though the new device is a single disk.
If it's an U3 stick, it may behave like two devices.
You'll have to
Figure out how to mirror a root pool on one USB stick to another. It gives me
the error "new device must be a single disk" even though the new device is a
single disk.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discus
There has been no forward progress on the ZFS read performance issue
for a week now. A 4X reduction in file read performance due to having
read the file before is terrible, and of course the situation is
considerably worse if the file was previously mmapped as well. Many
of us have sent a lot
Ross wrote:
I don't think this is anything unusual, nor suspicious. Sun have released huge
amounts of code to the open source communities, and the very fact that you can
come on these forums, ask a question like that, and get answers back from some
of the kernel developers shows just how open
Yup, that's one feature I'm eagerly awaiting too, the list of things it could
facilitate is huge.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discu
On Jul 12, 2009, at 08:05, Cyril Plisko wrote:
Indeed. However willingness to openly develop opensource project or
lack of that of is also considered by community.
Open source is much more than throwing the code over the wall.
Heck, in the early pilot days I was told by a number of Sun engineer
On Jul 11, 2009, at 21:11, Anil wrote:
When it comes out, how will it work?
I'm more interested in being able to remove devices from a pool, and
perhaps changing a pool from RAID-Z to -Z2 on the fly.
Presumably all of these features are depending on *bp re-write.
_
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
This is the first I have heard about a ZFS deduplication project. Is there a
public anouncement (from Sun) somewhere that there is a ZFS deduplication
project or are you just speculating that there might be such a project?
Ahhh, I found some menti
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, Cyril Plisko wrote:
So Jeff, Bill and team (I know you are on this list), is there any
reason ZFS deduplication project isn't run as OpenSolaris project ?
With code repository, mailing list and all the other things publicly
available. That way the development process becomes
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, Cyril Plisko wrote:
Open source is much more than throwing the code over the wall.
Heck, in the early pilot days I was told by a number of Sun engineers,
that the reason things are taking time is exactly that - we do not
want to just throw the code over the wall - we want to
Hello James,
> Hi Cyril,
> I don't work with Jeff and Bill, and I cannot speak for them
> about this.
>
> What I can say, however, is that "open source" does not always
> equate to requiring "open development".
Indeed. However willingness to openly develop opensource project or
lack of that of is
I don't think this is anything unusual, nor suspicious. Sun have released huge
amounts of code to the open source communities, and the very fact that you can
come on these forums, ask a question like that, and get answers back from some
of the kernel developers shows just how open Sun is.
Howe
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:53:59 +0300
Cyril Plisko wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 7:06 AM, James C.
> McPherson wrote:
> > Anil wrote:
> >>
> >> When it comes out, how will it work?
> >>
> >> Does it work at the pool level or a zfs file system level? If I
> >> create a zpool called 'zones' and the
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Cyril Plisko wrote:
> I am talking about the process, not the announcement.
What's wrong with process?
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
z
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Andre van Eyssen wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, Cyril Plisko wrote:
>
>> There is an ongoing speculations of what/when/how deduplication will
>> be in ZFS and I am curious: what is the reason to keep the thing
>> secret ? I always thought open source assumes open de
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, Cyril Plisko wrote:
There is an ongoing speculations of what/when/how deduplication will
be in ZFS and I am curious: what is the reason to keep the thing
secret ? I always thought open source assumes open development
process. What exactly people behind deduplication effort t
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 7:06 AM, James C.
McPherson wrote:
> Anil wrote:
>>
>> When it comes out, how will it work?
>>
>> Does it work at the pool level or a zfs file system level? If I
>> create a zpool called 'zones' and then I create several zones
>> underneath that, could I expect to see a lot
25 matches
Mail list logo
