On Jul 25, 2009, at 16:30, Carson Gaspar wrote:
Frank Middleton wrote:
Doesn't this mean /any/ hardware might have this problem, albeit
with much lower probability?
No. You'll lose unwritten data, but won't corrupt the pool, because
the on-disk state will be sane, as long as your iSCSI
On Jul 25, 2009, at 15:32, Frank Middleton wrote:
Can you comment on if/how mirroring or raidz mitigates this, or tree
corruption in general? I have yet to lose a pool even on a machine
with fairly pathological problems, but it is mirrored (and copies=2).
Presumably at least on of the drives
Hello I recently purchased some hardware which I plan on turning into a data
server.
I purchased the following:
4 gigs of registered ECC ram 667
SuperMicro X7DCA motherboard (found it for really cheap and figured it couldn't
be too bad)
Brian wrote:
Hello I recently purchased some hardware which I plan on turning into a data
server.
I purchased the following:
4 gigs of registered ECC ram 667
SuperMicro X7DCA motherboard (found it for really cheap and figured it couldn't
be too bad)
dick hoogendijk wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 21:58:48 + (UTC)
Marc Bevand m.bev...@gmail.com wrote:
dick hoogendijk dick at nagual.nl writes:
I live in Holland and it is not easy to find motherboards that (a)
truly support ECC ram and (b) are (Open)Solaris compatible.
Erik Trimble wrote:
I _believe_ all socket AM2, AM2+ and AM3 consumer chips (Phenom,
Phenom II, Athlon X2, Athlon X3 and Athlon X4) also support unbuffered
non-registered ECC. The AMD Specs page for the above processors
indicates I'm right about those CPUs.
Quick correction: the
On 07/25/09 04:30 PM, Carson Gaspar wrote:
No. You'll lose unwritten data, but won't corrupt the pool, because
the on-disk state will be sane, as long as your iSCSI stack doesn't
lie about data commits or ignore cache flush commands. Why is this so
difficult for people to understand? Let me
dick hoogendijk wrote:
r...@westmark:/# share
-...@store/snaps /store/snaps sec=sys,rw=arwen,root=arwen
arwen# zfs send -Rv rp...@0906 /net/westmark/store/snaps/rpool.0906
zsh: permission denied: /net/westmark/store/snaps/rpool.0906
try sharing with the @ network syntax. See man
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, David Magda wrote:
That's the whole point of this thread: what should happen, or what should the
file system do, when the drive (real or virtual) lies about the syncing? It's
just as much a problem with any other POSIX file system (which have to deal
with fsync(2))--ZFS
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 12:14:03 -0400
Oscar del Rio del...@mie.utoronto.ca wrote:
dick hoogendijk wrote:
r...@westmark:/# share
-...@store/snaps /store/snaps sec=sys,rw=arwen,root=arwen
arwen# zfs send -Rv rp...@0906
arwen# /net/westmark/store/snaps/rpool.0906
zsh:
byleal,
Can you share how to recreate or test this?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
What's the deal with the mailing list? I've unsubscribed an old email address,
and attempted to sign up the new one 4 times now over the last month, and have
yet to receive any updates/have it approved. Are the admins asleep at the helm
for zfs-discuss or what?
--
This message posted from
Yea I have a cheap nvidia video card I found that should work with this. I
found this MB at Fry's for under 100 dollars so I figured Id try it out. Its
probably a discontinued line of server motherboards by SuperMicro so I figured
it probably would be an OK board.
1.) Why would I put the
Im sorry I forgot to ask again if its worth setting to the Time Limited
Recovery to its Raid counterpart mode. The reason I ask is because all I can
find to do this is a DOS file so Im not sure how I would go about doing it in
OpenSolaris.
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Brian wrote:
as its great for that but I decided to try out ZFS. Now I read that
its advisable to scrub the system every week or month, is it
possible just to make a script that will do this so I dont have to
be there? Also I know ZFS can use blank hard drives that will
On 26-Jul-09, at 11:08 AM, Frank Middleton wrote:
On 07/25/09 04:30 PM, Carson Gaspar wrote:
No. You'll lose unwritten data, but won't corrupt the pool, because
the on-disk state will be sane, as long as your iSCSI stack doesn't
lie about data commits or ignore cache flush commands. Why is
Brian wrote:
Im sorry I forgot to ask again if its worth setting to the Time Limited Recovery to its Raid counterpart mode. The reason I ask is because all I can find to do this is a DOS file so Im not sure how I would go about doing it in OpenSolaris.
17 matches
Mail list logo
