Re: [zfs-discuss] What about this status report

2010-03-29 Thread Harry Putnam
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes: Ethan notet...@gmail.com writes: Assuming your drives support SMART, I'd install smartmontools and see if there are any SMART errors on the drive. While the absence of SMART errors [...] I've had trouble getting smartmontools to work with some of my

[zfs-discuss] Adaptec AAC driver

2010-03-29 Thread Bruno Sousa
Hello all, Currently i'm evaluating a system with an Adaptec 52445 Raid HBA, and the driver supplied by Opensolaris doesn't support JBOD drives. I'm running snv_134 but when i try to do uninstall the SUNWacc driver i have the following error : pkgrm SUNWaac The following package is currently

Re: [zfs-discuss] Adaptec AAC driver

2010-03-29 Thread Yariv Graf
Hi I had the same problem with 2405 Remove aac of 134 and istall driver from adaptec . Driver for sol10u4 But working 10 On Mar 29, 2010, at 4:25 PM, Bruno Sousa bso...@epinfante.com wrote: Hello all, Currently i'm evaluating a system with an Adaptec 52445 Raid HBA, and the driver supplied

[zfs-discuss] FYI: Ben Rockwood: Solaris no longer free

2010-03-29 Thread Eugen Leitl
Just FYI, flame wars please /dev/null http://www.cuddletech.com/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=1120 Solaris No Longer Free 28 Mar '10 - 10:14 by benr Hot on the heals of Oracle's revamp of Solaris support, the licensing agreement for free downloads of Solaris 10 have changed. Infoworld broke the

Re: [zfs-discuss] Adaptec AAC driver

2010-03-29 Thread Cyril Plisko
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Bruno Sousa bso...@epinfante.com wrote: Hello all, Currently i'm evaluating a system with an Adaptec 52445 Raid HBA, and the driver supplied by Opensolaris doesn't support JBOD drives. I'm running snv_134 but when i try to do uninstall the SUNWacc driver i

Re: [zfs-discuss] Adaptec AAC driver

2010-03-29 Thread Bruno Sousa
pkg uninstall aac Creating Planpkg: Cannot remove 'pkg://opensolaris.org/driver/storage/a...@0.5.11 ,5.11-0.134:20100302T021758Z' due to the following packages that depend on it: pkg://opensolaris.org/storage/storage-ser...@0.1,5.11-0.134:20100302T050950Z pkg uninstall aac storage-server pkg:

Re: [zfs-discuss] What about this status report

2010-03-29 Thread Tonmaus
Both are driver modules for storage adapters Properties can be reviewed in the documentation: ahci: http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5177/ahci-7d?a=view mpt: http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5177/mpt-7d?a=view ahci has a man entry on b133, as well. cheers, Tonmaus -- This message posted

Re: [zfs-discuss] Adaptec AAC driver

2010-03-29 Thread James Lee
On 03/29/2010 09:32 AM, Yariv Graf wrote: Hi I had the same problem with 2405 Remove aac of 134 and istall driver from adaptec . Driver for sol10u4 On Mar 29, 2010, at 4:25 PM, Bruno Sousa bso...@epinfante.com mailto:bso...@epinfante.com wrote: Currently i'm evaluating a system with an

Re: [zfs-discuss] Adaptec AAC driver

2010-03-29 Thread Cyril Plisko
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Bruno Sousa bso...@epinfante.com wrote:  pkg uninstall aac Creating Planpkg: Cannot remove 'pkg://opensolaris.org/driver/storage/a...@0.5.11 ,5.11-0.134:20100302T021758Z' due to the following packages that depend on it:

Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool split problem?

2010-03-29 Thread Mark J Musante
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010, Frank Middleton wrote: Started with c0t1d0s0 running b132 (root pool is called rpool) Attached c0t0d0s0 and waited for it to resilver Rebooted from c0t0d0s0 zpool split rpool spool Rebooted from c0t0d0s0, both rpool and spool were mounted Rebooted from c0t1d0s0, only rpool

Re: [zfs-discuss] Cannot replace a replacing device

2010-03-29 Thread Mark J Musante
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Victor Latushkin wrote: On Mar 29, 2010, at 1:57 AM, Jim wrote: Yes - but it does nothing. The drive remains FAULTED. Try to detach one of the failed devices: zpool detach tank 4407623704004485413 As Victor says, the detach should work. This is a known issue and

Re: [zfs-discuss] b134 - Mirrored rpool won't boot unless both mirrors are present

2010-03-29 Thread Richard Jahnel
Exactly where in the menu.lst would I put the -r ? Thanks in advance. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

[zfs-discuss] sharing a ssd between rpool and l2arc

2010-03-29 Thread F. Wessels
Hi, as Richard Elling wrote earlier: For more background, low-cost SSDs intended for the boot market are perfect candidates. Take a X-25V @ 40GB and use 15-20 GB for root and the rest for an L2ARC. For small form factor machines or machines with max capacity of 8GB of RAM (a typical home system)

Re: [zfs-discuss] Cannot replace a replacing device

2010-03-29 Thread Jim
Thanks for the suggestion, but have tried detaching but it refuses reporting no valid replicas. Capture below. C3P0# zpool status pool: tank state: DEGRADED scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank

Re: [zfs-discuss] Cannot replace a replacing device

2010-03-29 Thread Jim
Thanks for the suggestion, but have tried detaching but it refuses reporting no valid replicas. Capture below. C3P0# zpool status pool: tank state: DEGRADED scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz1 DEGRADED 0 0 0 ad4 ONLINE 0 0 0 ad6 ONLINE 0 0 0

Re: [zfs-discuss] What about this status report

2010-03-29 Thread Harry Putnam
Just to apologize This not only sounds lame but IS pretty lame. Somehow in reading the output of `zpool status POOL', I just blew right by the URL included there: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-9P Which has quite a decent discussion of what it means.

Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool cannot replace a replacing device

2010-03-29 Thread Miles Nordin
cm == Courtney Malone court...@courtneymalone.com writes: j == Jim biainmcna...@hotmail.com writes: j Thanks for the suggestion, but have tried detaching but it j refuses reporting no valid replicas. yeah this happened to someone else also, see list archives around 2008-12-03:

[zfs-discuss] zfs recreate questions

2010-03-29 Thread JD Trout
I have a quick ZFS question. With most hardware raid controllers all the data and the info is stored on the disk. Therefore, the integrity of the data can survive a controller failure or the deletion of the LUN as long as it is recreated with the same drives in the same location. Does this

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs recreate questions

2010-03-29 Thread Manoj Joseph
JD Trout wrote: I have a quick ZFS question. With most hardware raid controllers all the data and the info is stored on the disk. Therefore, the integrity of the data can survive a controller failure or the deletion of the LUN as long as it is recreated with the same drives in the same

[zfs-discuss] zfs diff

2010-03-29 Thread David Magda
A new ARC case: There is a long-standing RFE for zfs to be able to describe what has changed between the snapshots of a dataset. To provide this capability, we propose a new 'zfs diff' sub-command. When run with appropriate privilege the sub-command describes what file system level changes

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs diff

2010-03-29 Thread Nicolas Williams
One really good use for zfs diff would be: as a way to index zfs send backups by contents. Nico -- ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs recreate questions

2010-03-29 Thread JD Trout
That is great to hear. What is the command to do this? I setup a test situation and I would like to give it a try. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs recreate questions

2010-03-29 Thread Brandon High
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:49 PM, JD Trout jdtr...@ucla.edu wrote: That is great to hear. What is the command to do this? I setup a test situation and I would like to give it a try. If you can plan the removal, simply 'zpool export' your pool, then 'zpool import' it on the new controller /

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs diff

2010-03-29 Thread Nicolas Williams
zfs diff is incredibly cool. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs diff

2010-03-29 Thread Bruno Sousa
On 30-3-2010 0:39, Nicolas Williams wrote: One really good use for zfs diff would be: as a way to index zfs send backups by contents. Nico Any prevision about the release target? snv_13x? Bruno smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[zfs-discuss] pool won't import

2010-03-29 Thread Tom Bird
r...@cs6:~# zpool import pool: content3 id: 14184872052409584084 state: FAULTED status: The pool metadata is corrupted. action: The pool cannot be imported due to damaged devices or data. The pool may be active on another system, but can be imported using the '-f' flag.

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs diff

2010-03-29 Thread Mike Gerdts
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@sun.com wrote: One really good use for zfs diff would be: as a way to index zfs send backups by contents. Or to generate the list of files for incremental backups via NetBackup or similar. This is especially important for file

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs recreate questions

2010-03-29 Thread JD Trout
Perfect. Thanks! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs diff

2010-03-29 Thread Bart Smaalders
On 03/29/10 16:44, Mike Gerdts wrote: On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@sun.com wrote: One really good use for zfs diff would be: as a way to index zfs send backups by contents. Or to generate the list of files for incremental backups via NetBackup or

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs diff

2010-03-29 Thread Daniel Carosone
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 06:38:47PM -0400, David Magda wrote: A new ARC case: I read this earlier this morning. Welcome news indeed! I have some concerns about the output format, having worked with similar requirements in the past. In particular: as part of the monotone VCS when reporting

Re: [zfs-discuss] pool won't import

2010-03-29 Thread Richard Elling
On Mar 29, 2010, at 4:42 PM, Tom Bird wrote: r...@cs6:~# zpool import pool: content3 id: 14184872052409584084 state: FAULTED status: The pool metadata is corrupted. action: The pool cannot be imported due to damaged devices or data. The pool may be active on another system, but

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs diff

2010-03-29 Thread Daniel Carosone
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:37:15PM +1100, Daniel Carosone wrote: There will also need to be clear rules on output ordering, with respect to renames, where multiple changes have happened to renamed files. Separately, but relevant in particular to the above due to the potential for races: what

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs diff

2010-03-29 Thread Tim Haley
On 3/29/10 8:02 PM, Daniel Carosone wrote: On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:37:15PM +1100, Daniel Carosone wrote: There will also need to be clear rules on output ordering, with respect to renames, where multiple changes have happened to renamed files. Separately, but relevant in particular to the

Re: [zfs-discuss] sharing a ssd between rpool and l2arc

2010-03-29 Thread Daniel Carosone
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 01:10:22PM -0700, F. Wessels wrote: The caiman installer allows you to control the size of the partition on the boot disk but it doesn't allow you (at least I couldn't figure out how) to control the size of the slices. So you end with slice0 filling the entire

Re: [zfs-discuss] sharing a ssd between rpool and l2arc

2010-03-29 Thread Daniel Carosone
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 03:13:45PM +1100, Daniel Carosone wrote: You can: - install to a partition that's the size you want rpool - expand the partition to the full disk - expand the s2 slice to the full disk - leave the s0 slice for rpool alone - make another slice for l2arc in the