On 2-8-2010 2:53, Richard Elling wrote:
On Jul 30, 2010, at 11:35 AM, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
Just wondering if anyone has experimented with working out the best zvol
recordsize for a zvol which is backing a zpool over iSCSI?
This is an interesting question. Today, most ZFS
I have several filesystems in a raid-z pool. All seem to be working correctly
except one which is mounted but yields the following with ls -lh:
?- ? ?? ? ? media
I just finished scrubbing the pool and there are no errors. I can't seem to do
anything with the
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 08:48 -0700, Brian wrote:
I have several filesystems in a raid-z pool. All seem to be working
correctly except one which is mounted but yields the following with ls -lh:
?- ? ?? ? ? media
I just finished scrubbing the pool and there
Thanks Preston. I am actually using ZFS locally, connected directly to 3 sata
drives in a raid-z pool. The filesystem is ZFS and it mounts without complaint
and the pool is clean. I am at a loss as to what is happening.
-brian
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Loran
But here's what's keeping me up at night: We're running zpool v15,
which as I understand it means if an X25e log fails, the pool is toast.
Obviously, the log devices are not
