Disk /dev/zvol/rdsk/pool/dcpool: 4295GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Just to check, did you already try:
zpool import -d /dev/zvol/rdsk/pool/ poolname
?
thanks Andy.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Disk /dev/zvol/rdsk/pool/dcpool: 4295GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Just to check, did you already try:
zpool import -d /dev/zvol/rdsk/pool/ poolname
Thanks for the sugestion. As a matter of fact, I did not try that.
But it hasn't helped (possibly tue to partitioning
Dan,
Tried export data after beadm umount, but on reboot zpool data is simply
not imported at all...
So exporting data before reboot dosen;t appear to help..
thanks
Matt
On 06/01/11 01:35, Daniel Carosone wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 05:32:47PM +0100, Matt Keenan wrote:
Jim,
Thanks
2011/6/1 Edward Ned Harvey opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com:
(2) The above is pretty much the best you can do, if your server is going
to be a normal server, handling both reads writes. Because the data and
the meta_data are both stored in the ARC, the data has a tendency
On 6/1/11 12:51 AM, lance wilson wrote:
The problem is that nfs clients that connect to my solaris 11 express server
are not inheriting the acl's that are set for the share. They create files that
don't have any acl assigned to them, just the normal unix file permissions. Can
someone please
I figure this group will know better than any other I have contact
with, is 700-800 I/Ops reasonable for a 7200 RPM SATA drive (1 TB Sun
badged Seagate ST31000N in a J4400) ? I have a resilver running and am
seeing about 700-800 writes/sec. on the hot spare as it resilvers.
There is no other
On 01 June, 2011 - Paul Kraus sent me these 0,9K bytes:
I figure this group will know better than any other I have contact
with, is 700-800 I/Ops reasonable for a 7200 RPM SATA drive (1 TB Sun
badged Seagate ST31000N in a J4400) ? I have a resilver running and am
seeing about 700-800
I have a resilver running and am
seeing about 700-800 writes/sec. on the hot spare as it resilvers.
IIRC resilver works in block birth order (write order) which is
commonly more-or-less sequential unless the fs is fragmented. So it
might or might not be. I think you cannot get that kind of
Hi list,
I've got a pool thats got a single raidz1 vdev. I've just some more
disks in and I want to replace that raidz1 with a three-way mirror. I
was thinking I'd just make a new pool and copy everything across, but
then of course I've got to deal with the name change.
Basically, what is
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Matt Harrison
iwasinnamuk...@genestate.com wrote:
Hi list,
I've got a pool thats got a single raidz1 vdev. I've just some more disks in
and I want to replace that raidz1 with a three-way mirror. I was thinking
I'd just make a new pool and copy everything
On 01/06/2011 20:45, Eric Sproul wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Matt Harrison
iwasinnamuk...@genestate.com wrote:
Hi list,
I've got a pool thats got a single raidz1 vdev. I've just some more disks in
and I want to replace that raidz1 with a three-way mirror. I was thinking
I'd just
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Matt Harrison
iwasinnamuk...@genestate.com wrote:
Thanks Eric, however seeing as I can't have two pools named 'tank', I'll
have to name the new one something else. I believe I will be able to rename
it afterwards, but I just wanted to check first. I'd have to
Hi Matt,
You have several options in terms of migrating the data but I think the
best approach is to do something like I have described below.
Thanks,
Cindy
1. Create snapshots of the file systems to be migrated. If you
want to capture the file system properties, then see the zfs.1m
man page
On 01/06/2011 20:52, Eric Sproul wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Matt Harrison
iwasinnamuk...@genestate.com wrote:
Thanks Eric, however seeing as I can't have two pools named 'tank', I'll
have to name the new one something else. I believe I will be able to rename
it afterwards, but I
On 01/06/2011 20:53, Cindy Swearingen wrote:
Hi Matt,
You have several options in terms of migrating the data but I think the
best approach is to do something like I have described below.
Thanks,
Cindy
1. Create snapshots of the file systems to be migrated. If you
want to capture the file
On 01 June, 2011 - Eric Sproul sent me these 0,8K bytes:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Matt Harrison
iwasinnamuk...@genestate.com wrote:
Hi list,
I've got a pool thats got a single raidz1 vdev. I've just some more disks in
and I want to replace that raidz1 with a three-way mirror. I
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Matt Harrison
iwasinnamuk...@genestate.com wrote:
On 01/06/2011 20:52, Eric Sproul wrote:
What files would those be? Usually the pool name (and therefore the
dataset names) doesn't matter-- only mountpoints matter to most things
on the system, but maybe you
Hello experts,
I've had a lingering question for some time: when I
use zpool iostat -v the values do not quite sum up.
In the example below with a raidz2 array made of 6
drives:
* the reported 33K of writes are less than two disks'
workload at this time (at 17.9K each), overall
disks writes
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Eric Sproul espr...@omniti.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Matt Harrison
iwasinnamuk...@genestate.com wrote:
Hi list,
I've got a pool thats got a single raidz1 vdev. I've just some more disks
in
and I want to replace that raidz1 with a
At your suggestion I created a file locally and these were correct, in that
they inherited the acl that was applied to the top level.
-rwxrwxrwx+ 1 testuid testgid0 Jun 1 21:04 localtest
user:root:rwxpdDaARWcCos:--I:allow
Hi all
I have this pool that has been suffering from some bad backplanes etc.
Currently it's showing up ok, but after a resilver, a spare is stuck.
raidz2-5 ONLINE 0 0 4
c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t2d0 ONLINE 1 0
Since you can't mix vdev types in a single pool, you'll have to create
a new pool. But you can use zfs send/recv to move the datasets, so
your mountpoints and other properties will be preserved.
Last I checked, mixing different VDEV types in a pool was possible, but not
really recommended.
Yeah, this is a known problem. The DTL on the toplevel shows an outage, and is
preventing the removal of the spare even though removing the spare won't make
the outage worse.
Unfortunately, for opensolaris anyway, there is no workaround.
You could try doing a full scrub, replacing any disks
Yeah, this is a known problem. The DTL on the toplevel shows an
outage, and is preventing the removal of the spare even though
removing the spare won't make the outage worse.
Unfortunately, for opensolaris anyway, there is no workaround.
You could try doing a full scrub, replacing any
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 09:36 -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Matthew Ahrens mahr...@delphix.com
wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Matt Weatherford
m...@u.washington.edu wrote:
pike# zpool get version internal
On 06/ 2/11 09:18 AM, lance wilson wrote:
At your suggestion I created a file locally and these were correct, in that
they inherited the acl that was applied to the top level.
-rwxrwxrwx+ 1 testuid testgid0 Jun 1 21:04 localtest
user:root:rwxpdDaARWcCos:--I:allow
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:42:24AM -0600, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
Looks like the linux client did a chmod(2) after creating the file.
I bet this is it, and this seems to have been ignored in the later thread.
what happens when you create a file locally in that directory on the
solaris
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 12:54 -0400, Paul Kraus wrote:
I figure this group will know better than any other I have contact
with, is 700-800 I/Ops reasonable for a 7200 RPM SATA drive (1 TB Sun
badged Seagate ST31000N in a J4400) ? I have a resilver running and am
seeing about 700-800 writes/sec.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Eric Sproul espr...@omniti.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Matt Harrison
iwasinnamuk...@genestate.com wrote:
Hi list,
I've got a pool thats got a single raidz1 vdev. I've
29 matches
Mail list logo
