On 7/19/2011 7:10 PM, Gordon Ross wrote:
The idea: A new "aclmode" setting called "discard", meaning that
the users don't care at all about the traditional mode bits. A
dataset with aclmode=discard would have the chmod system call and NFS
setattr do absolutely nothing to the mode bits.
The c
On 7/19/2011 6:37 PM, Daniel Carosone wrote:
If there were an acl permission for "set legacy permission bits",
as distinct from write_acl, that could be set to "deny" at whatever
granularity you needed...
That does sound interesting; but given it would most likely require an
update to the NFS
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Gordon Ross wrote:
> And then for about $400 one can get an 250GB SSD, such as:
> Crucial M4 CT256M4SSD2 2.5" 256GB SATA III MLC Internal Solid State
> Drive (SSD)
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820148443
>
> Anyone have experience with e
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Gordon Ross
>
> Anyone have experience with either one? (good or bad)
>
> Opinions whether the lower capacity and higher cost of
> the SSD is justified in terms of performance for things
> li
Gordon,
If I were you, I would choose SSD. I have good experience with Intel 320
SSD.
My company use it for L2ARC with good result. And quality is good
Rocky
-Original Message-
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
[mailto:zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Gordon R
I'm looking to upgrade the disk in a high-end laptop (so called
"desktop replacement" type). I use it for development work,
runing OpenIndiana (native) with lots of ZFS data sets.
These "hybrid" drives look kind of interesting, i.e. for about $100,
one can get:
Seagate Momentus XT ST95005620AS 5
Do you mean that OI148 might have a bug that Solaris 11 Express might solve? I
will download the Solaris 11 Express LiveUSB and give it a shot.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://m
Am 20.07.11 18:31, schrieb Brandon High:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
wrote:
Kidding aside, for anyone finding this thread at a later time, here's the
answer. It sounds unnecessarily complex at first, but then I went through
it ... Only took like a minute or two. It was
Have you tried to boot from LiveCD in Solaris 11 Express and compare?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hello All ,
I am looking for some way change GUID for zpool on unix Solaris SAN , maybe
some one know ?
We need copy on storage level volumes and open on same mashine .
Regards,
Evgeny
<>___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
htt
Hello all,
I'm building a file server (or just a storage that I intend to access by
Workgroup from primarily Windows machines) using zfs raidz2 and openindiana
148. I will be using this to stream blu-ray movies and other media, so I will
be happy if I get just 20MB/s reads, which seems like a pr
http://blog.backblaze.com/2011/07/20/petabytes-on-a-budget-v2-0revealing-more-secrets/
Seem to be real 512 Byte sectors, too.
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com h
>I was aware of that suggestion but found it so ugly that I never tried it. I
>ditched pride and embraced pragmatism. And yes running find did resolve all
>names. Could you be so kind and trouble the gentleman down the hall and ask
>them what's happening and why? Perhaps something can be done abo
13 matches
Mail list logo
