Josh,
You mention that Oracle is preparing patches for both Solaris 11.2 and
S10u11, does that mean that the bug exist in Solaris 10 as well? I may be
wrong but Cindy mentioned the bug is only in Solaris 11.
Regards,
sendai
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
Hi,
Is there a summary somewhere which describes exactly which ZFS related
events/errors appears in FMA today, also some sort of roadmap about
events/errors that are planned to be reported via FMA in the future?
Regards,
sendai
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
Please find this thread for further info about this topic :
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=120824&start=0&tstart=0
In short, ZFS doesn't support thin reclamation today, although we have RFE open
to implement it somewhere in the future.
Regards,
sendai
--
This message pos
Mike,
As far as I know only Hitachi is using such a huge chunk size :
"So each vendor’s implementation of TP uses a different block size. HDS use
42MB on the USP, EMC use 768KB on DMX, IBM allow a variable size from 32KB to
256KB on the SVC and 3Par use blocks of just 16KB. The reasons for thi
Just an update :
Finally I found some technical details about this Thin Reclamation API :
(http://blogs.hds.com/claus/2009/12/i-love-it-when-a-plan-comes-together.html)
"This week, (December 7th), Symantec announced their “completing the thin
provisioning ecosystem” that includes the necessary
Let me sum up my thoughts in this topic.
To Richard [relling] : I agree with you this topic is even more confusing if we
are not careful enough to specify exactly what we are talking about. Thin
provision can be done on multiple layers, and though you said you like it to be
closer to the app th
Richard,
That's an interesting question, if it's worth it or not. I guess the question
is always who are the targets for ZFS (I assume everyone, though in reality
priorities has to set up as the developer resources are limited). For a home
office, no doubt thin provisioning is not much of a use
Devzero,
Unfortunately that was my assumption as well. I don't have source level
knowledge of ZFS, though based on what I know it wouldn't be an easy way to do
it. I'm not even sure it's only a technical question, but a design question,
which would make it even less feasible.
Apart from the te
Hi,
Does anyone heard about having any plans to support thin devices by ZFS? I'm
talking about the thin device feature by SAN frames (EMC, HDS) which provides
more efficient space utilization. The concept is similar to ZFS with the pool
and datasets, though the pool in this case is in the SAN f
Damon,
Yes, we can provide simple concat inside the array (even though today we
provide RAID5 or RAID1 as our standard, and using Veritas with concat), the
question is more of if it's worth it to switch the redundancy from the array to
the ZFS layer.
The RAID5/1 features of the high-end EMC ar
Hi,
When I read the ZFS manual, it usually recommends to configure redundancy at
the ZFS layer, mainly because there are features that will work only with
redundant configuration (like corrupted data correction), also it implies that
the overall robustness will improve.
My question is simple,
Hi,
I'm aware that if we talking about DMP on Solaris the preferred way is to use
MPxIO, still I have a question if any of you got any experience with ZFS on top
of Veritas DMP?
Does it work? Is it supported? Any real life experience/tests in this subject?
Regards,
sendai
--
This message post
12 matches
Mail list logo
