On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Edward Ned Harvey
solar...@nedharvey.com wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Asif Iqbal
would be nice if i could pipe the zfs send stream to a split and then
send of those splitted stream
tool do that?
something like this
s | - | j
- | o zfs recv
(local) l | - | i (remote)
t | - | n
copy from the fifos to tape(s).
Asif Iqbal
I did look at doing this, with the intention of allowing
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting
/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Richard Elling
richard.ell...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 20, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Asif Iqbal vad...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a T2000 with a dual port 4gb hba (QLE2462) and a 3510FC with
one controller 2gb/s attached
localpool/d...@now | ssh remotehost zfs recv remotepool/data
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
___
zfs-discuss mailing
storage guys found no other issue besides the battery.
should disabling zil improve performance? I won't try it until we get
the battery so not to risk data loss
during outage.
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Asif Iqbal vad...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a T2000 with a dual port 4gb hba (QLE2462) and a 3510FC with
one controller 2gb/s attached to it.
I am running sol 10 u3 .
every time I change the recordsize of the zfs fs the disk IO improves
(doubles) and stay like
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Asif Iqbal vad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Asif Iqbal vad...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a T2000 with a dual port 4gb hba (QLE2462) and a 3510FC with
one controller 2gb/s attached to it.
I am running sol 10 u3 .
every time I change
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Richard Elling
richard.ell...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 20, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Asif Iqbal vad...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a T2000 with a dual port 4gb hba (QLE2462) and a 3510FC with
one controller 2gb/s attached
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Richard Elling
richard.ell...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 20, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Asif Iqbal vad...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a T2000 with a dual port 4gb hba (QLE2462) and a 3510FC with
one controller 2gb/s attached
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Richard Elling
richard.ell...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 20, 2010, at 7:09 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Richard Elling
richard.ell...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 20, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:51 PM
/write_attributes/write_acl/write_owner:deny
6:everyone@:list_directory/read_data/read_xattr/execute/read_attributes
/read_acl/synchronize:allow
I made sure the zfs aclmode is set to passthrough
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Asif Iqbal vad...@gmail.com wrote:
How do I make sure any new file inherit the group permission from its
directory in ZFS?
I tried to add a non-trivial acl (index id 3), but the files
permissions are still following the users umask
# ls -dv folder/
drwxrwxr
Hi All
Does anyone have any experience on running qmail on solaris 10 with ZFS only?
I would appreciate if you share your findings, suggestion and gotchas
Thanks
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q
, suggestion and gotchas
It just works.
Is there any performance penalty over ufs ?
--
Best regards,
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people
-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
Generic_120011-14 64-bit
Mar 23 04:39:37 syslog1 genunix: [ID 943907 kern.notice] Copyright
1983-2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Second crash actually matches bug id 6618522
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Asif Iqbal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First crash seems to match BUG ID 6439484
Second crash seems to match BUG ID 6523336
I see both of them are closed without any recommendation.
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 1:22
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Asif Iqbal
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 3:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [perf-discuss] [storage-discuss] zpool io to 6140 is really
slow
... you are going to
then stripe over controllers .. as one way of looking at it.
PS: Is this a direct connection? Switched fabric?
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Nov 20, 2007 7:01 AM, Chad Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/20/07, Asif Iqbal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 19, 2007 1:43 AM, Louwtjie Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 17, 2007 9:40 PM, Asif Iqbal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Including storage-discuss)
I have 6
and improving
performance. They will then catch up during periods when few writes are
being issued. But a typical microbenchmark that pumps out a steady stream of
writes won't see this benefit.
Drew Wilson
Asif Iqbal wrote:
On Nov 20, 2007 7:01 AM, Chad Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Nov 19, 2007 1:43 AM, Louwtjie Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 17, 2007 9:40 PM, Asif Iqbal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Including storage-discuss)
I have 6 6140s with 96 disks. Out of which 64 of them are Seagate
ST337FC (300GB - 1 RPM FC-AL)
Those disks are 2Gb disks
On Nov 17, 2007 9:12 AM, Louwtjie Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have a 6140 with SAS drives ?! When did this happen?
OOPS! I meant FC-AL
On Nov 17, 2007 12:30 AM, Asif Iqbal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the following layout
A 490 with 8 1.8Ghz and 16G mem. 6 6140s with 2 FC
IO.
I should get ~ 512MB/s per IO.
Also is it possible to get 2GB/s IO by using the leftover ports of the
controllers?
Is it also possible to get 4GB/s IO by aggregating the controllers (w/
8 ports totat)?
On Nov 16, 2007 5:30 PM, Asif Iqbal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the following
/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide#Cache_Flushes
Asif Iqbal wrote:
(Including storage-discuss)
I have 6 6140s with 96 disks. Out of which 64 of them are Seagate
ST337FC (300GB - 1 RPM FC-AL)
I created 16k seg size raid0 luns using single fcal disks. Then
created a zpool with 8 4+1 raidz1 using
IO of only 125MB/s with zfs:zfs_nocacheflush = 1 in
/etc/system
Is there a way I can improve the performance. I like to get 1GB/sec IO.
Currently each lun is setup as primary A1 and secondary B1 or vice versa
I also have write cache eanble according to CAM
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On 4/24/07, Asif Iqbal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone has any suggestion besides what I am planning to use?
On 4/21/07, Asif Iqbal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a master system w/ few non-glabal zones on zfs fs runnin sol 10
11/06. I need to build few systems using the master system
|
zfs recv to build the zfs part later.
Is there anything simpler? Is there a sun blueprint or any third party
article that covers exact same scenario?
Thanks
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs
changed it back.
(the fw800 card didn't work)
-frank
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
On 10/20/06, Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Asif Iqbal wrote:
On 10/20/06, Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Asif Iqbal wrote:
Hi
I have a X2100 with two 74G disks. I build the OS on the first disk
with slice0 root 10G ufs, slice1 2.5G swap, slice6 25MB ufs and slice7
X2100s and ship it out.
I am running Sol 10 u2.
Thanks
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
35 matches
Mail list logo
