On Jul 31, 2008, at 2:56 PM, Bob Netherton wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 13:25 -0700, Ross wrote:
Hey folks,
I guess this is an odd question to be asking here, but I could do
with some
feedback from anybody who's actually using ZFS in anger.
ZFS in anger ? That's an interesting way of
http://www.opensolaris.org/bug/report.jspa
You'll need an OpenSolaris.org account to file the RFE of course.
On Jul 17, 2008, at 10:52 AM, Will Murnane wrote:
I would like to request an additional flag for the command line zfs
tools. Specifically, I'd like to have a -t flag for zfs destroy,
Here's the announcement for those new Sun JBOD devices mentioned the
other day.
http://www.sun.com/aboutsun/pr/2008-07/sunflash.20080709.1.xml
ckl
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Apparently known bug, fixed in snv_70.
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6577473
On Aug 14, 2007, at 8:28 AM, Bill Moloney wrote:
using hyperterm, I captured the panic message as:
SunOS Release 5.11 Version snv_69 32-bit
Copyright 1983-2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc.
With US patent laws the way they are, no one but a patent lawyer
could safely give you an answer.
If by some chance a patent lawyer is lurking and decided to comment,
none of the rest of us
could safely read such comments. No one working on ZFS could even
safely look at the patent
you've
On Oct 5, 2006, at 6:48 PM, Frank Cusack wrote:
On October 5, 2006 5:25:17 PM -0700 David Dyer-Bennet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
b.net wrote:
Well, unless you have a better VCS than CVS or SVN. I first met this
as an obscure, buggy, expensive, short-lived SUN product, actually; I
believe it was
On Sep 14, 2006, at 1:32 PM, Henk Langeveld wrote:
Bady, Brant RBCM:EX wrote:
Part of the archiving process is to generate checksums (I happen
to use
MD5), and store them with other metadata about the digital object in
order to verify data integrity and demonstrate the authenticity of
the
On Sep 12, 2006, at 4:39 PM, Celso wrote:
On 12/09/06, Celso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it has already been said that in many
peoples experience, when a disk fails, it completely
fails. Especially on laptops. Of course ditto blocks
wouldn't help you in this situation either!
Exactly.
It uses extra space in the middle of the write, in order to hold the
new data, but once
the write is complete, the space occupied by the old version is now
free for use.
ckl
On Jul 12, 2006, at 8:05 PM, Robert Chen wrote:
I still could not understand why Copy on Write does not waste file
