Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS: unreliable for professional usage?

2009-02-12 Thread D. Eckert
after all statements read here I just want to highlight another issue regarding ZFS. It was here many times recommended to set copies=2. Installing Solaris 10 10/2008 or snv_107 you can choose either to use UFS or ZFS. If you choose ZFS by default, the rpool will be created by default with

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS: unreliable for professional usage?

2009-02-11 Thread D. Eckert
(...) Good. It looks like this thread can finally die. I received the following in response to my message below: (...) I apologize that your eMail could not be delivered. This is to either the mail server you use is considered as a machine from a dynamic ip pool or your mail server is anywhere

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS: unreliable for professional usage?

2009-02-11 Thread D. Eckert
(...) Ah... an illiterate AND idiotic bigot. (...) I apologize for my poor English. Yes, it's not my mother tongue, but I have no doubt at all, that this discussion could be continued in German as well. But just to make it clear: Finally I did understand very well were I went wrong. But it

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS: unreliable for professional usage?

2009-02-10 Thread D. Eckert
(..) Dave made a mistake pulling out the drives with out exporting them first. For sure also UFS/XFS/EXT4/.. doesn't like that kind of operations but only with ZFS you risk to loose ALL your data. that's the point! (...) I did that many times after performing the umount cmd with ufs/reiserfs

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS: unreliable for professional usage?

2009-02-10 Thread D. Eckert
I disagree, see posting above. ZFS just accepts it 2 or 3 times. after that, your data are passed away to nirvana for no reason. And it should be legal, to have an external USB drive with a ZFS. with all respect, why should a user always care for redundancy, e. g. setup a mirror on a single

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS: unreliable for professional usage?

2009-02-10 Thread D. Eckert
(...) If anyone asks questions, they get no actual information, but a huge amount of blame heaped on the sysadmin. Your post is a great example of the typical way this problem is handled because it does both: deny information and blame the sysadmin. Though I'm really picking on you way too much

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS: unreliable for professional usage?

2009-02-10 Thread D. Eckert
(...) You don't move a pool with 'zfs umount', that only unmounts a single zfs filesystem within a pool, but the pool is still active.. 'zpool export' releases the pool from the OS, then 'zpool import' on the other machine. (...) with all respect: I never read such a non logic ridiculous . I

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS: unreliable for professional usage?

2009-02-10 Thread D. Eckert
(...) Possibly so. But if you had that ufs/reiserfs on a LVM or on a RAID0 spanning removable drives, you probably wouldn't have been so lucky. (...) we are not talking about a RAID 5 array or an LVM. We are talking about a single FS setup as a zpool over the entire available disk space on an

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS: unreliable for professional usage?

2009-02-10 Thread D. Eckert
I think you are not reading carefully enough, and I can trace from your reply a typically American arrogant behavior. WE, THE PROUDEST AND infallibles on earth DID NEVER MAKE a mistake. It is just the stupid user who did not read the fucking manual carefully enough. Hello? Did you

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS: unreliable for professional usage?

2009-02-10 Thread D. Eckert
if you are interested in my IP Address: no problem: 83.236.164.80 it just exactly approves my assumption, that's best and easier for someone - if he's in the right position - to adhere a big pavement on someone's mouth to avoid hearing a legal critique instead of discussing out the problem to

[zfs-discuss] ZFS: unreliable for professional usage?

2009-02-09 Thread D. Eckert
Hi, after working for 1 month with ZFS on 2 external USB drives I have experienced, that the all new zfs filesystem is the most unreliable FS I have ever seen. Since working with the zfs, I have lost datas from: 1 80 GB external Drive 1 1 Terrabyte external Drive It is a shame, that zfs has

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS: unreliable for professional usage?

2009-02-09 Thread D. Eckert
Hi Caspar, thanks for you reply. I completely disagreed to your opinion, that is USB. And seems as well, that I am not the only one having this opinion regarding ZFS. However, the hardware used is: 1 Sun Fire 280R Solaris 10 generic 10-08 latest updates 1 Lenovo T61 Notebook running Solaris

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS: unreliable for professional usage?

2009-02-09 Thread D. Eckert
too many words wasted, but not a single word, how to restore the data. I have read the man pages carefully. But again: there's nothing said, that on USB drives zfs umount pool is not allowed. So how on earth should a simple user know that, if he knows that filesystems properly unmounted using

[zfs-discuss] Mount ZFS pool on different system

2009-01-03 Thread D. Eckert
Hi, I have a faulty hard drive on my notebook, but I have all my data stored on an external USB HDD with a zfs. Now I want to mount that external zfs hdd on a different notebook running solaris and supporting zfs as well. I am unable to do so. If I'd run zpool create, it would wipe out my

[zfs-discuss] SOLVED: Mount ZFS pool on different system

2009-01-03 Thread D. Eckert
RTFM seems to solve many problems ;-) :# zpool import poolname -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss