Hi Brandon,
Thanks for the details. Sounds to me like Nexenta is in the lead!
Kind regards,
Hans Rattink
2011/5/24 Richard Elling
> On May 24, 2011, at 12:49 PM, Brandon High wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Richard Elling
> > wrote:
> >> There a
Thanks all, this cleared up some grey details for me!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
> IMHO, oracle would prefer customer go with ZFS
> appliance with added
> WebGUI and all the extra support like Analytics,
> L2ARc and ZIL with SSD etc
Last week i've seen mirrored ZIL upon ZEUS SSD in a Boston NexentaStor solution.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
Hi Erik and Kebabber,
Thanks for your answers. Do i summarize it right saying: the best conclusion
would be then that Nexenta has it's own version of ZFS and has nothing to fear
of Oracle other ZFS-developpers but that it's uncertain what NetApp might come
up with as the details aren't publishe
I have a more generall question about intellectual rights around ZFS, when
taking a look at the storage solution NexentaStor.
Perhaps not necessary to mention, but to be complete: NexentaStor has created a
Open Source SAN solution that runs on commodity hardware. Compellent for
example has a NA
