Re: [zfs-discuss] mdb ::memstat including zfs buffer details?

2007-11-12 Thread Jonathan Adams
On Nov 8, 2007 4:21 PM, Nathan Kroenert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all - Just a quick one... Is there any plan to update the mdb ::memstat dcmd to present ZFS buffers as part of the summary? At present, we get something like: ::memstat Page SummaryPages

Re: [zfs-discuss] mdb ::memstat including zfs buffer details?

2007-11-12 Thread Jonathan Adams
On Nov 12, 2007 4:16 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think it should be too bad (for ::memstat), given that (at least in Nevada), all of the ZFS caching data belongs to the zvp vnode, instead of kvp. ZFS data buffers are attached to zvp; however, we still keep metadata in

Re: [zfs-discuss] compression=on and zpool attach

2007-09-11 Thread Jonathan Adams
On 9/11/07, Dick Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got 12Gb or so of db+web in a zone on a ZFS filesystem on a mirrored zpool. Noticed during some performance testing today that its i/o bound but using hardly any CPU, so I thought turning on compression would be a quick win. I know I'll

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: Lots of seeks?

2006-08-11 Thread Jonathan Adams
storage, update the uberblock. That's a lot more complicated than the current model, but certainly seems possible. Cheers, - jonathan (this is only my understanding of how ZFS works; I could be mistaken) -- Jonathan Adams, Solaris Kernel Development

Re: [zfs-discuss] Assertion raised during zfs share?

2006-08-04 Thread Jonathan Adams
filesystem using the traditional methods. Once that's OK I'll move on to the ZFS portion and investigate. Out of curiosity, why are you trying to do this? Cheers, - jonathan -- Jonathan Adams, Solaris Kernel Development ___ zfs-discuss mailing list

Re: [zfs-discuss] 15 minute fdsync problem and ZFS: Solved

2006-06-22 Thread Jonathan Adams
the sync happens. Cheers, - jonathan -- Jonathan Adams, Solaris Kernel Development ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: AW: AW: [zfs-discuss] Proposal for new basic privileges related with filesystem access checks

2006-06-22 Thread Jonathan Adams
} and using that to allow such processes to re-open files they _recently_ (the cache should have LRU/LFU eviction) opened. That doesn't seem like a very predictable interface. The security guarantees are not very strong. Cheers, - jonathan -- Jonathan Adams, Solaris Kernel Development

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS questions

2006-06-20 Thread Jonathan Adams
group commits. Cheers, - jonathan -- Jonathan Adams, Solaris Kernel Development ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] Question about /etc/default/fs for a zfs based zone

2006-05-15 Thread Jonathan Adams
use zfs(1M) for all that kind of manipulation, it seems like this is not a huge deal. Cheers, - jonathan -- Jonathan Adams, Solaris Kernel Development ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo