I am using 4 SATA II drives, with this card (see the comments) which got
detected by Solaris automatically:
http://napobo3.blogspot.com/2006/04/sata2-under-b36.html
I understand that my 32bit CPU is the limiting factor? But that seems a bit
strange I think. A [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be able to
I did that, and here are the results from the ZFS jury:
bash-3.00$ timex dd if=/dev/zero of=file bs=128k count=8192
8192+0 records in
8192+0 records out
real 19.40
user 0.01
sys1.54
That is, 1GB created on 20sec = 50MB/sec. That is better, but still not good,
I am using Solaris Express Community build 67 installed on a 40GB harddrive
(UFS filesystem on Solaris), dual boot with Windows XP. I have a zfsraid with 4
samsung drives. It is a [EMAIL PROTECTED] and 1GB RAM.
When I copy a 1.3G file from ZFSpool to ZFSpool the command time cp file
file2
have set up a ZFS raidz with 4 samsung 500GB hard drives.
It is extremely slow when I mount a ntfs partition and copy everything to zfs.
Its like 100kb/sec or less. Why is that?
When I copy from ZFSpool to UFS, I get like 40MB/sec - isnt it very low
considering I have 4 new 500GB discs in
What brand is your 8 port satacontroller? I want one sata controller too, but
heard that Solaris is picky about the model. All controllers doesnt work. Your
does?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
201 - 205 of 205 matches
Mail list logo