Yes, everything seems to be fine, but that was still scary, and the fix was not
completely obvious. At the very least, I would suggest adding text such as the
following to the page at http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-FD :
When physically replacing the failed device, it is best to use the same
This is in snv_86. I have a four-drive raidz pool. One of the drives died. I
replaced it, but wasn't careful to put the new drive on the same controller
port; one of the existing drives wound up on the port that had previously been
used by the failed drive, and the new drive wound up on the
Well, the second resilver finished, and everything looks okay now. Doing one
more scrub to be sure...
-- Scott
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi,
I'm running snv_86 on a Tyan S2882-D. This board has an onboard Sil3114 SATA
controller which I have been using for my ZFS pool. Now I am trying to use
Xen, and I am told that it doesn't work with IDE mode disk drivers; but the
3114 doesn't seem to have a native SATA mode (the BIOS just
zpool export blah
move stuff
zpool import blah
Great, thanks, sorry for the FAQ :)
Would still like advice on the 1420SA.
-- Scott
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Never mind, I see the 1420SA doesn't work. (Search Google for 1420sa
solaris.)
The Supermicro AOC-SAT2-MV8 seems to be the recommended choice.
-- Scott
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
?? But the ZFS man page specifically says, A ZFS file system that is added to
a non-global zone must have its mountpoint property set to legacy. Is this
obsolete??
-- Scott
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
To my astonishment, the problem has turned out to be a bad power supply after
all. I didn't believe it until some of the SCSI drives in the same box started
acting up also.
Score: ZFS: 1, $180 OCZ PowerStream 600: 0 :)
I would still argue that a salvager would be a useful addition to ZFS
Oooh, I see build 74 suffered from
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6603147
There's not much info on that bug page, and I certainly don't recall seeing the
blown assertion message. Is it possible, nonetheless, that this is the cause
of some of my problems? I will Live Upgrade
Okay, I've done a little more reading on ZFS and I see that metadata is already
stored redundantly. This means something had to go really wrong for me to lose
a bunch of directories, as I did. Okay, that's another piece of information
I'm not sure what to make of, but I'll add it to the pile
10 matches
Mail list logo
