[zfs-discuss] Bad pool...

2011-05-24 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
Hi all I have a rather large pool that has been a bit troublesome. We've lost some drives (WD Black), and though that should work out well, I now have a pool that doesn't look too healthy. http://paste.ubuntu.com/611973/ Two drives have been resilvered, but the old drives still stick. The

Re: [zfs-discuss] Bad pool...

2011-05-24 Thread Donald Stahl
Two drives have been resilvered, but the old drives still stick. The drive that has died still hasn't been taken over by a spare, although the two spares show up as AVAIL. For the one that hasn't been replaced try doing: zpool replace dbpool c8t24d0 c4t43d0 For the two that have already been

Re: [zfs-discuss] Bad pool...

2011-05-24 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
Shouldn't ZFS detach these automatically? It has done so earlier... It is not supposed to- at least that I recall. Earlier replaces have gone well. One thing is spares, which I can understand somewhat, but dead drives should definetely be tossed off when replaced Vennlige hilsener / Best

Re: [zfs-discuss] Bad pool...

2011-05-24 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
The system became non-responsible after two drives was lost, and replaced with spares, in that VDEV. That bug has been filed and acknowleged. Take a RAIDz2 with two spares and remove a drive from the pool, let it resilver to a spare, remove another, wait until it resilvers again, and