Samba's integration with ZFS wasn't that great last time I tested. I had all
kinds of permission problems, mainly with inheritance. Windows deals with deny
entries very differently to Unix and I kept finding my test accounts were
denied access to new files folders.
Also, while I'm no Samba
Yeah, that's something I'd love to see. CIFS isn't quite there yet, but it's
miles ahead of Samba, and as soon as it is ready we'll want to be rolling it
out under Sun Cluster.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
Marcelo Leal wrote:
Thanks all for the answers!
Seems like the solution to have a opensolaris storage solution is the CIFS
project. And there is no agent to provide HA, so seems like a good project
too.
Currently, the HA-NFS service requires that you disable the
sharenfs property.
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Ross wrote:
Yeah, that's something I'd love to see. CIFS isn't quite there yet,
but it's miles ahead of Samba, and as soon as it is ready we'll want
to be rolling it out under Sun Cluster.
If Samba is already there for many people for many years, in what
way is native
Hello all,
i would like to continue with this topic, and after doing some research
about the topic, i have some (many) doubts, and maybe we could use this thread
to give some responses to me and other users that can have the same questions...
First, sorry to CC to many forums, but i think is a
Samba cifs has been in opensolaris from day1.
No, it cannot be used to meet sun's end goal which is cifs INTEGRATION
with the core kernel. Sun cifs supports windows acl's from the kernel
up. Samba does not.
On 6/22/08, Marcelo Leal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
i would like to
Marcelo Leal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello all,
[..]
1) What the difference between the smb server in solaris/opensolaris,
and the new project CIFS?
What you refer to as the smb server in solaris/opensolaris is in fact
Samba, which sits on top of a plain unix system. This has
