Jesus, is this argument still going on.
The only Linux-lookaliking going on here is the GNU toolchain in
/usr/gnu/bin spearheading the PATH variable (set in .bashrc) and bash
currently as default shell for regular users. Nothing else. Change the
user's shell, you're back to "Solaris".
-mg
> This,
> 0n Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 09:00:12AM -0700, Rich
> Teer wrote:
> >Summary: Solaris Express Community Edition
> (SXCE) is like the OpenSolaris
> >of old; OpenSolaris .xx is apparently Sun's
> intended future direction
> >for Solaris. Based on what I've heard, I've not
> tried the latter.
0n Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 09:00:12AM -0700, Rich Teer wrote:
>Summary: Solaris Express Community Edition (SXCE) is like the OpenSolaris
>of old; OpenSolaris .xx is apparently Sun's intended future direction
>for Solaris. Based on what I've heard, I've not tried the latter. If
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Rich Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Ross wrote:
>
> > Huh? Now I'm confused, I thought b95 was just the latest build of
> > OpenSolaris, I didn't realise that OpenSolaris 2008.05 was different, I
> > thought it was just an older, more stabl
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Ross wrote:
> Huh? Now I'm confused, I thought b95 was just the latest build of
> OpenSolaris, I didn't realise that OpenSolaris 2008.05 was different, I
> thought it was just an older, more stable build that was updated less
> often.
Welcome to the world of ret-conning. Wh
Huh? Now I'm confused, I thought b95 was just the latest build of OpenSolaris,
I didn't realise that OpenSolaris 2008.05 was different, I thought it was just
an older, more stable build that was updated less often.
Is there anything else I'm missing out on by using snv_94 instead of
OpenSolari
Mario,
>> Latest BeleniX OpenSolaris uses the Caiman installer so it may be
>> worth installing it just to see what it is like. I installed it under
>> VirtualBox yesterday. Installing using "whole disk" did not work with
>> VirtualBox but the suggested default partitioning did work.
>>
> Latest BeleniX OpenSolaris uses the Caiman installer so it may be
> worth installing it just to see what it is like. I installed it under
> VirtualBox yesterday. Installing using "whole disk" did not work with
> VirtualBox but the suggested default partitioning did work.
OpenSolaris 2008.05
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Lori Alt wrote:
>>
> There are no plans to add zfs root support to the existing
> install GUI. GUI install support for zfs root will be
> provided by the new Caiman installer.
Latest BeleniX OpenSolaris uses the Caiman installer so it may be
worth installing it just to see w
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Lori Alt wrote:
> There are no plans to add zfs root support to the existing
> install GUI. GUI install support for zfs root will be
> provided by the new Caiman installer.
Thanks for the info. Follow-up question: is there an ETA for when
Caiman will be integrated into Neva
Rich Teer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I recently installed b95 and ZFS root is great! I used the
> CLI installer because I remember reading that the GUI installer
> doesn't yet support ZFS root. So my question is, what's the
> ETA for support in the GUI installer for ZFS root?
>
> TIA,
>
>
There are
Hi all,
I recently installed b95 and ZFS root is great! I used the
CLI installer because I remember reading that the GUI installer
doesn't yet support ZFS root. So my question is, what's the
ETA for support in the GUI installer for ZFS root?
TIA,
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA
CEO,
My Onli
12 matches
Mail list logo
