On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 9:10 PM
Instant Poll : Yes/No ?
No.
Methinks the MRU/MFU balance algorithm adjustment is
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:26:20PM -0500, Tim Cook wrote:
I'd go with the option of allowing both a weighted and a forced option. I
agree though, if you do primarycache=metadata, the system should still
attempt to cache userdata if there is additional space remaining.
I think I disagree.
On Jun 3, 2011, at 6:25 AM, Roch wrote:
Edward Ned Harvey writes:
Based on observed behavior measuring performance of dedup, I would say, some
chunk of data and its associated metadata seem have approximately the same
warmness in the cache. So when the data gets evicted, the associated
Edward Ned Harvey writes:
Based on observed behavior measuring performance of dedup, I would say, some
chunk of data and its associated metadata seem have approximately the same
warmness in the cache. So when the data gets evicted, the associated
metadata tends to be evicted too. So
Edward Ned Harvey writes:
If you consider the extreme bias... If the system would never give up
metadata in cache until all the cached data were gone... Then it would be
similar to the current primarycache=metadata, except that the system would
be willing to cache data too, whenever
Based on observed behavior measuring performance of dedup, I would say, some
chunk of data and its associated metadata seem have approximately the same
warmness in the cache. So when the data gets evicted, the associated
metadata tends to be evicted too. So whenever you have a cache miss,
