On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Nicolas Williams wrote:
Right. That only happens from NFSv3 clients [that don't instead edit the
POSIX Draft ACL translated from the ZFS ACL], from non-Windows NFSv4
clients [that don't instead edit the ACL], and from local applications
[that don't instead edit the ZFS
Hi Cindy,
That sounds very reassuring.
Thanks a lot.
Simon
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 04:30:05PM -0600, Cindy Swearingen wrote:
Hi Simon,
I don't think you will see much difference for these reasons:
1. The CIFS server ignores the aclinherit/aclmode properties.
Because CIFS/SMB has no chmod operation :)
2. Your aclinherit=passthrough setting
Any ideas anyone?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi Simon,
I don't think you will see much difference for these reasons:
1. The CIFS server ignores the aclinherit/aclmode properties.
2. Your aclinherit=passthrough setting overrides the aclmode
property anyway.
3. The only difference is that if you use chmod on these files
to manually change
Currently I'm still using OpenSolaris b134 and I had used the 'aclmode'
property on my file systems. However, the aclmode property has been dropped
now:
http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2010/029/20100126_mark.shellenbaum
I'm wondering what will happen to the ACLs on these files and
