Hello Sam,
Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 3:23:55 AM, you wrote:
S I've had my 10x500 ZFS+ running for probably 6 months now and had
S thought it was scrubbing occasionally (wrong) so I started a scrub
S this morning, its almost done now and I got this:
S errors: No known data errors
S # zpool
I've had my 10x500 ZFS+ running for probably 6 months now and had thought it
was scrubbing occasionally (wrong) so I started a scrub this morning, its
almost done now and I got this:
errors: No known data errors
# zpool status
pool: pile
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has
Could this someway be related to this rather large (100GB) difference that 'zfs
list' and 'zpool list' report:
NAME SIZE USED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT
pile 4.53T 4.31T 223G95% ONLINE -
# zfs list
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
pile 3.44T 120G 3.44T /pile
I know
Sam schrieb:
I've had my 10x500 ZFS+ running for probably 6 months now and had thought it
was scrubbing occasionally (wrong) so I started a scrub this morning, its
almost done now and I got this:
errors: No known data errors
# zpool status
pool: pile
state: ONLINE
status: One or more
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Sam wrote:
So it says its a minor error but still one to be concerned about, I
thought resilvering takes care of checksum errors, does it not?
Should I be running to buy 3 new 500GB drives?
Presumably these are SATA drives. Studies show that typical SATA
drives tend to