On 5 apr 2010, at 04.35, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> When running the card in copyback write cache mode, I got horrible
>> performance (with zfs), much worse than with copyback disabled
>> (which I believe should mean it does write-through), when tested
>> with filebench.
>
> When I benchmark my
> When running the card in copyback write cache mode, I got horrible
> performance (with zfs), much worse than with copyback disabled
> (which I believe should mean it does write-through), when tested
> with filebench.
When I benchmark my disks, I also find that the system is slower with
WriteBack
Hello,
Maybe this question should be put on another list, but since there
are a lot of people here using all kinds of HBAs, this could be right
anyway;
I have a X4150 running snv_134. It was shipped with a "STK RAID INT"
adaptec/intel/storagetek/sun SAS HBA.
When running the card in copyback wr
