Kory,
I'm sorry that you had to go through this. We're all working very hard to
make ZFS better for everyone. We've noted this problem on the ZFS Best
Practices wiki to try and help avoid future problems until we can get the
quotas issue resolved.
-- richard
Kory Wheatley wrote:
Richard,
I a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/21/2007 11:00:43 AM:
>
> >The problem is that in order to restrict disk usage, ZFS *requires*
> >that you create this many filesystems. I think most in this situation
> >would prefer not to have to do that. The two solutions I see would
> >be to add user quotas
>The problem is that in order to restrict disk usage, ZFS *requires*
>that you create this many filesystems. I think most in this situation
>would prefer not to have to do that. The two solutions I see would
>be to add user quotas to ZFS or to be able to set a quota on a
>directory without it beco
Richard Elling wrote:
> I think this is a systems engineering problem, not just a ZFS problem.
> Few have bothered to look at mount performance in the past because
> most systems have only a few mounted file systems[1]. Since ZFS does
> file system quotas instead of user quotas, now we have the si
I think this is a systems engineering problem, not just a ZFS problem.
Few have bothered to look at mount performance in the past because
most systems have only a few mounted file systems[1]. Since ZFS does
file system quotas instead of user quotas, now we have the situation
where there could be
Hi Kory - Your problem came our way through other Sun folks a few days ago,
and I wish I had that magic setting to help, but the reality is that I'm
not aware
of anything that will improve the time required to mount 12k file systems.
I would add (not that this helps) that I'm not convinced this
Jim Mauro wrote:
(I'm probably not the best person to answer this, but that has never stopped me
before, and I need to give Richard Elling a little more time to get the Goats,
Cows
and Horses fed, sip his morning coffee, and offer a proper response...)
chores are done, wading through the morni
(I'm probably not the best person to answer this, but that has never
stopped me
before, and I need to give Richard Elling a little more time to get the
Goats, Cows
and Horses fed, sip his morning coffee, and offer a proper response...)
Would it benefit us to have the disk be setup as a raidz alo
Hello Kory,
Tuesday, March 20, 2007, 4:38:03 PM, you wrote:
KW> The reason for this question is we currently have our disk setup
KW> in a hardware raid5 on a EMC device and these disks are configured
KW> as a zfs file system. Would it benefit us to have the disk be
KW> setup as a raidz along wit
The reason for this question is we currently have our disk setup in a hardware
raid5 on a EMC device and these disks are configured as a zfs file system.
Would it benefit us to have the disk be setup as a raidz along with the
hardware raid 5 that is already setup too? Or with this double raid
10 matches
Mail list logo
