Re: [zfs-discuss] Redundancy for /opt by raidz?

2008-12-31 Thread Vincent Fox
Dear Admin u said: choose a 3-disk RAID-1 or a 4-disk RAID10 set for tank over RAIDZ aWith a 3-disk mirror you'd have a disk left over to be hot spare for failure in either rpool or tank. why do u prefer raid1 with one spare rather than raidz? i heard raidz has better redundancy than raid 1 or 5?!

Re: [zfs-discuss] Redundancy for /opt by raidz?

2008-12-30 Thread iman habibi
Dear Admin I have a server with 6 HDD,in fresh installation i select two disks for mirroring and create rpool and installing solaris10,but i need further space than default rpool`s file systems for installing my application. (for example mysql).so i decide create another pool (named tank) with 4

Re: [zfs-discuss] Redundancy for /opt by raidz?

2008-12-30 Thread Vincent Fox
div id=jive-html-wrapper-div Dear AdminbrI have a server with 6 HDD,in fresh installation i select two disks for mirroring and create rpool and installing solaris10,but i need further space than default rpool`s file systems for installing my application. (for example mysql).so i decide

Re: [zfs-discuss] Redundancy for /opt by raidz?

2008-12-29 Thread Vincent Fox
Seems a lot simpler to create a multi-way mirror. Then symlink your /opt/BIND or whatever off to new place. # zpool create opt-new mirror c3t40d0 c3t40d1 c3t40d2 c3t40d3 # zpool status pool: opt-new state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM

[zfs-discuss] Redundancy for /opt by raidz?

2008-12-27 Thread iman habibi
Dear Admins My machine is ultra-sparc and has 6 H.D.D .I want to run an application server(Dns server),with perfect redundancy and data protection for my operating system and application files and folders. i install bind on /opt. so during solaris 10 installation i choose two disks for mirroring