I've been trying to get either smartctl or sg3_utils to report properly.
They both have the same low-level problems which leads me to suspect
either I'm doing something wrong OR there is a problem in the
marvell88sx / sd / SATA etc framework.
I can access drive name/serial number of all
I don't know how relevant this is to you on Nexenta, but I can tell you that
the driver support for that card improved tremendously with OpenSolaris
2008.11. All of our hot swap problems went away with that release but the
change wasn't documented anywhere that I could see.
It might be worth
Mam Ruoc wrote:
Carsten wrote:
I will ask my boss about this (since he is the one
mentioned in the
copyright line of smartctl ;)), please stay tuned.
How is this going? I'm very interested too...
Not much happening right now, December meetings, holiday season, ...
But thanks for
Carsten wrote:
I will ask my boss about this (since he is the one
mentioned in the
copyright line of smartctl ;)), please stay tuned.
How is this going? I'm very interested too...
Mam
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss
Thanks for the recommendations.
I should have mentioned that I already tried that smartmontools. I've
read that there are problems with smartmontools and Solaris.
Sure enough, I get this error:
# /usr/local/sbin/smartctl -a -d ata /dev/rdsk/c2t0d0
smartctl version 5.38 [i386-pc-solaris2.11]
the sata framework uses the sd driver so its:
4 % smartctl -d scsi -a /dev/rdsk/c4t2d0s0
smartctl version 5.36 [i386-pc-solaris2.8] Copyright (C) 2002-6 Bruce Allen
Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/
Device: ATA WDC WD1001FALS-0 Version: 0K05
Serial number:
Device type:
rl == Rob Logan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
rl the sata framework uses the sd driver so its:
yes but this is a really tiny and basically useless amount of output
compared to what smartctl gives on Linux with SATA disks, where SATA
disks also use the sd driver (the same driver Linux uses for
Hi all,
Miles Nordin wrote:
rl == Rob Logan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
rl the sata framework uses the sd driver so its:
yes but this is a really tiny and basically useless amount of output
compared to what smartctl gives on Linux with SATA disks, where SATA
disks also use the sd
How do I get SMART data from my drives?
I'm running snv_101 on AMD64.
I have 6x SATA disks.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
You are right... I shouldn't post in the middle of the night... nForce
chipsets don't support AHCI.
On 6/4/07, J. David Beutel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marko Milisavljevic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/02/2007
02:03:56 AM:
I think nForce 430 would be using AHCI driver if you set you BIOS for
I think nForce 430 would be using AHCI driver if you set you BIOS for
it, in current Nevada builds anyway, and I think that uses SATA
framework.
On 6/1/07, J. David Beutel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Schrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Friday, June 01, 2007 12:50:50:
Only devices that use
On Solaris x86, does zpool (or anything) support PATA (or SATA) IDE
SMART data? With the Predictive Self Healing feature, I assumed that
Solaris would have at least some SMART support, but what I've googled so
far has been discouraging.
See:
http://blogs.sun.com/eschrock/entry/solaris_platform_integration_generic_disk
Prior to the above work, we only monitored disks on Thumper (x4500)
platforms. With these changes we monitor basic SMART data for SATA
drives. Monitoring for SCSI drives will be here soon. The next step
will be
Excellent! Thanks! I've gleaned the following from your blog. Is this
correct?
* A week ago you committed a change that will:
** get current SMART parameters and faults for SATA on x86 via a single
function in a private library using SCSI emulation;
** decide whether they indicate any
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 12:33:29PM -1000, J. David Beutel wrote:
Excellent! Thanks! I've gleaned the following from your blog. Is this
correct?
* A week ago you committed a change that will:
** get current SMART parameters and faults for SATA on x86 via a single
function in a private
On 1-Jun-07, at 7:50 PM, Eric Schrock wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 12:33:29PM -1000, J. David Beutel wrote:
Excellent! Thanks! I've gleaned the following from your blog.
Is this
correct?
* A week ago you committed a change that will:
** get current SMART parameters and faults for SATA
16 matches
Mail list logo
