On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Albert Lee wrote:
While the S10 updates include features backported from Nevada you can
only upgrade from S10 to Solaris Express, not the other way around (which
would technically be a downgrade).
Understood; I had no intention of installing SXCE and then trying to layer
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Tim wrote:
They aren't even close to each other. Things like in-kernel cifs will
never be put back.
Right, so that would be a feature I would not avail of. In terms of ZFS, I
think the feature set of SXCE will be closer to S10U6 than S10U5. I want to
start testing out ZFS
I want to
start testing out ZFS boot and zfs allow to minimize the delay between the
release of U6 and my production deployment.
Good observation. I mention this in every Solaris briefing that I do.
Get some stick time with this capability using SXCE or OpenSolaris so
that you can reduce
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Bob Netherton wrote:
Get some stick time with this capability using SXCE or OpenSolaris so
that you can reduce the time it takes to deploy whatever upcoming Solaris
update has ZFS root (how's that for being evasive).
I've heard from reasonably credible sources that
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Paul B. Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Bob Netherton wrote:
Get some stick time with this capability using SXCE or OpenSolaris so
that you can reduce the time it takes to deploy whatever upcoming Solaris
update has ZFS root (how's that
How close is Solaris Express build 90 to what will be released as the
official Solaris 10 update 6?
We just bought five x4500 servers, but I don't really want to deploy in
production with U5. There are a number of features in U6 I'd like to have
(zfs allow for better integration with our local
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 17:52 -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
How close is Solaris Express build 90 to what will be released as the
official Solaris 10 update 6?
We just bought five x4500 servers, but I don't really want to deploy in
production with U5. There are a number of features in U6 I'd
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They aren't even close to each other. ?Things like in-kernel cifs will
never be put back.
My question is, what is holding you back from just deploying on sxce?
Sun now offers support for it.
To the best of my knowledge, Sun has
I guess I find the difference between b90 and opensolaris trivial
given we're supposed to be getting constant updates following the sxce
builds.
On 6/12/08, Mike Gerdts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They aren't even close to each other.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess I find the difference between b90 and opensolaris trivial
given we're supposed to be getting constant updates following the sxce
builds.
But the supported version of OpenSolaris will not be on the same
schedule as sxce.
...There was a post just this afternoon stating the opensolaris update
track would be back to following sxce with b91 so I haven't a clue
what you're talking about.
As for the features/support they're looking for, if they wanted
enterprise infallible storage, a thumper was the wrong choice day 1.
11 matches
Mail list logo
