Re: [zfs-discuss] Slashdot Article: Does ZFS Obsolete Expensive NAS/SANs?

2007-06-07 Thread Jens Elkner
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 12:10:18PM -0700, eric kustarz wrote: There's going to be some very good stuff for ZFS in s10u4, can you please update the issues *and* features when it comes out? Yes, and don't forget to add, that the POSIX ACL has been dropped/replaced by the braindamaged NFS4

Re: [zfs-discuss] Slashdot Article: Does ZFS Obsolete Expensive NAS/SANs?

2007-06-05 Thread Jesus Cea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 eric kustarz wrote: There's going to be some very good stuff for ZFS in s10u4, can you please update the issues *and* features when it comes out? Of course. That was my commitment when I decided to create the beware section in the wikipedia

Re: [zfs-discuss] Slashdot Article: Does ZFS Obsolete Expensive NAS/SANs?

2007-06-05 Thread eric kustarz
Would be very nice if the improvements would be documented anywhere :-) Cindy has been doing a good job of putting the new features into the admin guide: http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/docs/zfsadmin.pdf Check out the What's New in ZFS? section. eric

Re: [zfs-discuss] Slashdot Article: Does ZFS Obsolete Expensive NAS/SANs?

2007-06-05 Thread Jesus Cea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 eric kustarz wrote: Cindy has been doing a good job of putting the new features into the admin guide: http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/docs/zfsadmin.pdf Check out the What's New in ZFS? section. I will update the wikipedia entry when

Re: [zfs-discuss] Slashdot Article: Does ZFS Obsolete Expensive NAS/SANs?

2007-06-04 Thread eric kustarz
On Jun 2, 2007, at 8:27 PM, Jesus Cea wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toby Thain wrote: Sorry, I should have cited it. Blew my chance to moderate by posting to the thread :) http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=236627cid=19319903 I computed the FUD factor by

[zfs-discuss] Slashdot Article: Does ZFS Obsolete Expensive NAS/SANs?

2007-05-30 Thread Mark A. Carlson
http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/05/30/0135218from=rss ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] Slashdot Article: Does ZFS Obsolete Expensive NAS/SANs?

2007-05-30 Thread Toby Thain
On 30-May-07, at 4:28 PM, Mark A. Carlson wrote: http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/05/30/0135218from=rss One highly rated comment features some of the first real ZFS FUD I've seen in the wild. Does this signify that ZFS is being taken seriously now? :) --Toby

Re: [zfs-discuss] Slashdot Article: Does ZFS Obsolete Expensive NAS/SANs?

2007-05-30 Thread Jerry Kemp
What comment in particular was that? Jerry K Toby Thain wrote: On 30-May-07, at 4:28 PM, Mark A. Carlson wrote: http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/05/30/0135218from=rss One highly rated comment features some of the first real ZFS FUD I've seen in the wild. Does this signify that

Re: [zfs-discuss] Slashdot Article: Does ZFS Obsolete Expensive NAS/SANs?

2007-05-30 Thread Toby Thain
On 30-May-07, at 6:31 PM, Jerry Kemp wrote: What comment in particular was that? Sorry, I should have cited it. Blew my chance to moderate by posting to the thread :) http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=236627cid=19319903 I computed the FUD factor by sorting the items into known