Ok. Thanks. Why does '/' show up in the newly created /BE/etc/vfstab but not
in the current /etc/vfstab? Should '/' be in the /BE/etc/vfstab?
btw, thank you for responding so quickly to this.
Mark
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Enda O'Connor wrote:
> Mark Horstman wrote:
>
>> Then why the wa
Then why the warning on the lucreate. It hasn't done that in the past.
Mark
On Oct 21, 2009, at 12:41 PM, "Enda O'Connor"
wrote:
Hi T
his will boot ok in my opinion, not seeing any issues there.
Enda
Mark Horstman wrote:
more input:
# lumount foobar /mnt
/mnt
# cat /mnt/etc/vfstab
# cat
Hi
Yes sorry remove that line from vfstab in the new BE
Enda
Mark wrote:
Ok. Thanks. Why does '/' show up in the newly created /BE/etc/vfstab but
not in the current /etc/vfstab? Should '/' be in the /BE/etc/vfstab?
btw, thank you for responding so quickly to this.
Mark
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 a
Mark Horstman wrote:
Then why the warning on the lucreate. It hasn't done that in the past.
this is from the vfstab processing code in ludo.c, in your case not
causing any issue, but shall be fixed.
Enda
Mark
On Oct 21, 2009, at 12:41 PM, "Enda O'Connor" wrote:
Hi T
his will boot ok in
Hi T
his will boot ok in my opinion, not seeing any issues there.
Enda
Mark Horstman wrote:
more input:
# lumount foobar /mnt
/mnt
# cat /mnt/etc/vfstab
# cat /mnt/etc/vfstab
#live-upgrade: updated boot environment
#device device mount FS fsckmount mount
more input:
# lumount foobar /mnt
/mnt
# cat /mnt/etc/vfstab
# cat /mnt/etc/vfstab
#live-upgrade: updated boot environment
#device device mount FS fsckmount mount
#to mount to fsck point typepassat boot options
#
fd -
More input:
# cat /etc/lu/ICF.1
sol10u8:-:/dev/zvol/dsk/rpool/swap:swap:67108864
sol10u8:/:rpool/ROOT/sol10u8:zfs:0
sol10u8:/appl:pool00/global/appl:zfs:0
sol10u8:/home:pool00/global/home:zfs:0
sol10u8:/rpool:rpool:zfs:0
sol10u8:/install:pool00/shared/install:zfs:0
sol10u8:/opt/local:pool00/shared
Mark Horstman wrote:
I don't see anything wrong with my /etc/vfstab. Until I get this resolved, I'm
afraid to patch and use the new BE.
It's the vfstab file in the newly created ABE that is "wrongly" written to.
Try to mount this new ABE and check out for yourself.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP
Hi
This looks ok to me, message but not an indicator of an issue
could you post
cat /etc/lu/ICF.1
cat /etc/ICF.2 ( the foobar Be )
also lumount foobar /a
and cat /a/etc/vfstab
Enda
Mark Horstman wrote:
I'm seeing the same [b]lucreate[/b] error on my fresh SPARC sol10u8 install
(and my SPARC
Neither the virgin SPARC sol10u8 nor the (update to date) patched SPARC sol10u7
have any local zones.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-d
I'm seeing the same [b]lucreate[/b] error on my fresh SPARC sol10u8 install
(and my SPARC sol10u7 machine I keep patches up to date), but I don't have a
separate /var:
# zfs list
NAMEUSED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
pool00 3.36G 532G20K none
pool00/global
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Enda O'Connor wrote:
> This is 6884728 which is a regression from 6837400.
> the workaround is as you done, remove the lines from vfstab
Oh, ok, this is the problem described in CR 6884728? Disregard my earlier
inquiry for more details on that CR then.
I ran into exactly the
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:07:54 PDT
Brian wrote:
> ERROR: svc:/system/filesystem/minimal:default failed to mount /var
You have found it yourself already. LU packages from update 8 create
lines in /etc/vfstab for ZFS filesystems! Former LU packages never did!
They left a good working vfstab alone. T
Hi
This is 6884728 which is a regression from 6837400.
the workaround is as you done, remove the lines from vfstab
Enda
Brian wrote:
I am have a strange problem with liveupgrade of ZFS boot environment. I found a similar discussion on the zones-discuss, but, this happens for me on installs wi
On 14 October, 2009 - Brian sent me these 4,3K bytes:
> I am have a strange problem with liveupgrade of ZFS boot environment.
> I found a similar discussion on the zones-discuss, but, this happens
> for me on installs with and without zones, so I do not think it is
> related to zones. I have been
I am have a strange problem with liveupgrade of ZFS boot environment. I found
a similar discussion on the zones-discuss, but, this happens for me on installs
with and without zones, so I do not think it is related to zones. I have been
able to reproduce this on both sparc (ldom) and x86 (phsy
16 matches
Mail list logo
