Re: [zfs-discuss] Upgrading 2009.06 to something current

2010-08-10 Thread Dick Hoogendijk
On 1-8-2010 19:57, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: I've kind of given up on that. This is a home "production" server; it's got all my photos on it. The uncertainty around OpenSolaris made me drop it. I'm very sorry to say, because I loved the system. I do not want to worry all the time though, so

Re: [zfs-discuss] Upgrading 2009.06 to something current

2010-08-01 Thread Giovanni Tirloni
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 2:57 PM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: > What's a good choice for a decently stable upgrade?  I'm unable to run > backups because ZFS send/receive won't do full-pool replication reliably, it > hangs better than 2/3 of the time, and people here have told me later > versions (later

[zfs-discuss] Upgrading 2009.06 to something current

2010-08-01 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
What's a good choice for a decently stable upgrade? I'm unable to run backups because ZFS send/receive won't do full-pool replication reliably, it hangs better than 2/3 of the time, and people here have told me later versions (later than 111b) fix this. I was originally waiting for the "sprin