I do not know if ibm has officially said they support ZFS but with the latest
client (5.4.1.2) my file systems show up as ZFS now and a quick test restore
seems to restore ZFS ACL's as well now. They also all appear to be included as
local filesytems so no work arounds are needed to back them
Matt wrote:
I do not know if ibm has officially said they support ZFS but with the latest
client (5.4.1.2) my file systems show up as ZFS now and a quick test restore
seems to restore ZFS ACL's as well now. They also all appear to be included
as local filesytems so no work arounds are
I think he means this:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/v1r1/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.itsmc.doc_5.3.3/ans595.htm
On 8/13/07, Adrian Pead [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt wrote:
I do not know if ibm has officially said they support ZFS but with the
latest client (5.4.1.2)
John wrote:
Our main problem with TSM and ZFS is currently
that
there seems to be
no efficient way to do a disaster restore when the
backup
resides on tape - due to the large number of
filesystems/TSM filespaces.
The graphical client (dsmj) does not work at all
and
with dsmc one
John wrote:
John wrote:
Our main problem with TSM and ZFS is currently
that
there seems to be
no efficient way to do a disaster restore when the
backup
resides on tape - due to the large number of
filesystems/TSM filespaces.
The graphical client (dsmj) does not work at all
and
with dsmc one
Our main problem with TSM and ZFS is currently that
there seems to be
no efficient way to do a disaster restore when the
backup
resides on tape - due to the large number of
filesystems/TSM filespaces.
The graphical client (dsmj) does not work at all and
with dsmc one
has to start a
Our main problem with TSM and ZFS is currently that there seems to be
no efficient way to do a disaster restore when the backup
resides on tape - due to the large number of filesystems/TSM filespaces.
The graphical client (dsmj) does not work at all and with dsmc one
has to start a separate
Another option is to set the TSM server to do a selective backup of the zfs
filesystems. This is probably the least friendly of the solutions provided
though ... personally I'm switching to Tomas' suggestion.
Steve
On 7/10/07, Christopher Gibbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We use TSM to backup
Does anyone know when IBM will fully support TSM so we do not have to come
up with these work arounds?
On 7/10/07, Steve Zinck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another option is to set the TSM server to do a selective backup of the
zfs filesystems. This is probably the least friendly of the solutions
Does anyone have a customer
using IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) with ZFS? I see that IBM has a
client for Solaris 10, but does it work with ZFS?
--
Dan Christensen
System Engineer
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Des Moines, IA 50266 US
877-263-2204
On 09 July, 2007 - Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent me these 4,2K bytes:
Does anyone have a customer using IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) with
ZFS? I see that IBM has a client for Solaris 10, but does it work with ZFS?
You can backup ZFS filesystems, but it doesn't understand the ACLs right
now.
11 matches
Mail list logo
