Kyle McDonald wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> I assume that ZFS quotas are enforced even if the current
>>> size and space free is not included in the user visible 'df'.
>>> Is that not true?
>>>
>>> Presumably applications get some unexpected error when the
>>> quota limit is hit since t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I assume that ZFS quotas are enforced even if the current
>> size and space free is not included in the user visible 'df'.
>> Is that not true?
>>
>> Presumably applications get some unexpected error when the
>> quota limit is hit since the client OS does not know th
> I assume that ZFS quotas are enforced even if the current
> size and space free is not included in the user visible 'df'.
> Is that not true?
>
> Presumably applications get some unexpected error when the
> quota limit is hit since the client OS does not know the real
> amount of space fre
On Mon, 5 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The problem is the fact that NFS mounts cannot be done across
> filesystems as implemented with ZFS and Solaris 10. For example, we have
> client machines mounting to /groups/accounting... but we also have
> clients mounting to /groups directly.
On my
After struggling for some time to try and wedge a ZFS file server into
our environment, I have come to the conclusion that I'm simply going to
have to live without quotas. They have been immensely useful in the past
5 years or so in allowing us to keep track of which groups are hogging
disk space
