Constantine wrote:
ZFS doesn't do this.
I thought so too. ;)
Situation brief: I've got OpenSolaris 2009.06 installed on the RAID-5 array on
the controller with 512 Mb cache (as i can remember) without a cache-saving
battery.
I hope the controller disabled the cache then.
Probably a goo
And, if it matters, this OpenSolaris installed as Dom0 of xvm.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>ZFS doesn't do this.
I thought so too. ;)
Situation brief: I've got OpenSolaris 2009.06 installed on the RAID-5 array on
the controller with 512 Mb cache (as i can remember) without a cache-saving
battery. At the Friday lightning bolt hit the power supply station of
colocating company,and turn
Constantine wrote:
Hi.
I've got the ZFS filesystem (opensolaris 2009.06), witch, as i can see, was
automatically rollbacked by OS to the lastest snapshot after the power failure.
ZFS doesn't do this.
Can you give some more details of what you're seeing?
Would also be useful to see output of:
>Look in the (hidden) .zfs directory (mind the dot)
That was the first thing which i did, there is nothing new (except snapshots,
but i am on one of them already).
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@ope
On 14-8-2010 15:56, Constantine wrote:
Hi.
I've got the ZFS filesystem (opensolaris 2009.06), witch, as i can see, was
automatically rollbacked by OS to the lastest snapshot after the power failure.
There is a trouble - snapshot is too old, and ,consequently, there is a
questions -- Can I b
Hi.
I've got the ZFS filesystem (opensolaris 2009.06), witch, as i can see, was
automatically rollbacked by OS to the lastest snapshot after the power failure.
There is a trouble - snapshot is too old, and ,consequently, there is a
questions -- Can I browse pre-rollbacked corrupted branch of F
