Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS dedup success stories (take two)

2011-02-02 Thread Garrett D'Amore
On 01/31/11 04:48 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: As I've said here on the list a few times earlier, the last on the thread 'ZFS not usable (was ZFS Dedup question)', I've been doing some rather thorough testing on zfs dedup, and as you can see from the posts, it wasn't very satisfactory. The

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS dedup success stories (take two)

2011-02-02 Thread Craig Morgan
Two caveats inline … On 1 Feb 2011, at 01:05, Garrett D'Amore wrote: On 01/31/11 04:48 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: As I've said here on the list a few times earlier, the last on the thread 'ZFS not usable (was ZFS Dedup question)', I've been doing some rather thorough testing on zfs

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS dedup success stories (take two)

2011-02-01 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk Sorry about the initial post - it was wrong. The hardware configuration was right, but for initial tests, I use NFS, meaning sync writes. This obviously stresses the

[zfs-discuss] ZFS dedup success stories (take two)

2011-01-31 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
As I've said here on the list a few times earlier, the last on the thread 'ZFS not usable (was ZFS Dedup question)', I've been doing some rather thorough testing on zfs dedup, and as you can see from the posts, it wasn't very satisfactory. The docs claim 1-2GB memory usage per terabyte