That's why I said Nexenta. It's text mode after the fact, from the get go,
after the install and reboot.
http://www.nexenta.org/os
-Original Message-
Nexenta and Belenix will also run on this machine
with 512MB. Nexenta will probably be what you want if
you are saying you are
Hi
Not merely a little pokey it was unacceptably slow and the casing got very
warm. I am guessing it was pushing CPU right to 100% all the time. Took
hours to load and when booting took minutes. Also didn't see an easy way to
disable graphical login so on boot every time it would go to
Fit-PC Slim uses Geode LX800 which is 500 MHz CPU with 512 megs RAM.
Well... it's easy to disable graphical login:
svcadm disable cde-login
The problem is there's no option during install to say no graphics so during
firstboot it's going to try anyhow. At which point my console is hosed
Solaris 10 U6 and Solaris Express Community Edition can both be installed in
text mode. Nexenta and Belenix will also run on this machine with 512MB.
Nexenta will probably be what you want if you are saying you are running ubuntu
on this box.
-Original Message-
Fit-PC Slim uses
Planning to stick in a 160-gig Samsung drive and use it for lightweight
household server. Probably some Samba usage, and a tiny bit of Apache
RADIUS. I don't need it to be super-fast, but slow as watching paint dry
won't
You know that you need a minimum of 2 disks to form a (mirrored)
On 6 Nov 2008, at 04:09, Vincent Fox wrote:
According to the slides I have seen, a ZFS filesystem even on a
single disk can handle massive amounts of sector failure before it
becomes unusable. I seem to recall it said 1/8th of the disk? So
even on a single disk the redundancy in the
Al Hopper wrote:
Linux on it of course but now prefer to remain free of the tyranny of
fsck.
I don't think that there is enough CPU horse-power on this platform
to run OpenSolaris - and you need approx 768Kb (3/4 of a Gb) of RAM
just to install it. After that OpenSolaris will only
Mattias Pantzare wrote:
I even have a 256Mb debian in virtualbox on my server with 1Gb RAM.
Just turn X11 off. (/usr/dt/bin/dtconfig -d)
And how would that make VirtualBox run?
Does it not need X?
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u6 10/08 ++
On 06 November, 2008 - dick hoogendijk sent me these 0,4K bytes:
Mattias Pantzare wrote:
I even have a 256Mb debian in virtualbox on my server with 1Gb RAM.
Just turn X11 off. (/usr/dt/bin/dtconfig -d)
And how would that make VirtualBox run?
Does it not need X?
There's a headless
Anyone tried Nevada with ZFS on small platforms?
I ordered one of these:
http://www.fit-pc.com/new/fit-pc-slim-specifications.html
Planning to stick in a 160-gig Samsung drive and use it for lightweight
household server. Probably some Samba usage, and a tiny bit of Apache
RADIUS. I don't
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Vincent Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone tried Nevada with ZFS on small platforms?
Yes - on the least powerful system I would even think of trying ZFS on
- an Intel D945GCLF2 (dual-core 1.6GHz Atom 330) with 2Gb of RAM and
2 SATA ports. It came up in 32-bit
You know that you need a minimum of 2 disks to form a
(mirrored) pool
with ZFS? A pool with no redundancy is not a good
idea!
According to the slides I have seen, a ZFS filesystem even on a single disk can
handle massive amounts of sector failure before it becomes unusable. I seem
to
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Vincent Fox wrote:
According to the slides I have seen, a ZFS filesystem even on a
single disk can handle massive amounts of sector failure before it
becomes unusable.
When a tiny volcanic jet of molten plastic shoots out of the chip on
the disk drive (followed by a bit
13 matches
Mail list logo
