Le 20 févr. 08 à 23:03, Robert Milkowski a écrit :
> Hello Roch,
>
> Friday, February 15, 2008, 10:51:50 AM, you wrote:
>
> RB> Le 10 févr. 08 à 12:51, Robert Milkowski a écrit :
>
>>> Hello Nathan,
>>>
>>> Thursday, February 7, 2008, 6:54:39 AM, you wrote:
>>>
>>> NK> For kicks, I disabled the Z
Hello Roch,
Friday, February 15, 2008, 10:51:50 AM, you wrote:
RB> Le 10 févr. 08 à 12:51, Robert Milkowski a écrit :
>> Hello Nathan,
>>
>> Thursday, February 7, 2008, 6:54:39 AM, you wrote:
>>
>> NK> For kicks, I disabled the ZIL: zil_disable/W0t1, and that made
>> not a
>> NK> pinch of diff
Le 10 févr. 08 à 12:51, Robert Milkowski a écrit :
> Hello Nathan,
>
> Thursday, February 7, 2008, 6:54:39 AM, you wrote:
>
> NK> For kicks, I disabled the ZIL: zil_disable/W0t1, and that made
> not a
> NK> pinch of difference. :)
>
> Have you exported and them imported pool to get zil_disable
Hello Nathan,
Thursday, February 7, 2008, 6:54:39 AM, you wrote:
NK> For kicks, I disabled the ZIL: zil_disable/W0t1, and that made not a
NK> pinch of difference. :)
Have you exported and them imported pool to get zil_disable into
effect?
--
Best regards,
Robert Milkowski
Hey all -
I'm working on an interesting issue where I'm seeing ZFS being quite
cranky about writing O_SYNC written blocks.
Bottom line is that I have a small test case that does essentially this:
open file for writing -- O_SYNC
loop(
write() 8KB of random data
print time taken
