[zfs-discuss] brtfs on Solaris? (Re: [osol-discuss] [indiana-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?)

2010-04-14 Thread ольга крыжановская
brtfs could be supported on Opensolaris, too. IMO it could even complement ZFS and spawn some concurrent development between both. ZFS is too high end and works very poorly with less than 2GB while brtfs reportedly works well with 128MB on ARM. Olga On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:31 PM,

Re: [zfs-discuss] brtfs on Solaris? (Re: [osol-discuss] [indiana-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?)

2010-04-14 Thread Casper . Dik
brtfs could be supported on Opensolaris, too. IMO it could even complement ZFS and spawn some concurrent development between both. ZFS is too high end and works very poorly with less than 2GB while brtfs reportedly works well with 128MB on ARM. Both have license issues; Oracle can now re-license

Re: [zfs-discuss] brtfs on Solaris? (Re: [osol-discuss] [indiana-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?)

2010-04-14 Thread ольга крыжановская
I would like to see brtfs under a BSD license that FreeBSD/OpenBSD/NetBSD can adopt it, too. Olga 2010/4/14 casper@sun.com: brtfs could be supported on Opensolaris, too. IMO it could even complement ZFS and spawn some concurrent development between both. ZFS is too high end and works very