Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
Op
27-2-2010 13:15, Mertol Ozyoney schreef:
This depends on what you are looking for.
Generaly zfs will be more secure due to checksum feature. Having seen a
lot of ntfs / fat drives going south die to bad sectors i'd not clasify
them very secure. However ntfs and fa
Op 27-2-2010 13:15, Mertol Ozyoney schreef:
This depends on what you are looking for. Generaly zfs will be more
secure due to checksum feature. Having seen a lot of ntfs / fat drives
going south die to bad sectors i'd not clasify them very secure.
However ntfs and fat can be used nearly on ever
Hi,
This depends on what you are looking for. Generaly zfs will be more
secure due to checksum feature. Having seen a lot of ntfs / fat drives
going south die to bad sectors i'd not clasify them very secure.
However ntfs and fat can be used nearly on every os.
And also you shouldnt forget
On a -single- drive, what is the best filesystem to use: zfs, ntfs or
good old fat32
I've a 500G sata drive lying around which I can (samba) share from a
server (but then ntfs can not be used) or just format is with either
ntfs or fat32 and attach it with usb2 when needed. I'm in doubt.. I've
r