Re: [zfs-discuss] fat32 ntfs or zfs

2010-02-27 Thread Jeff Savit
Dick Hoogendijk wrote: Op 27-2-2010 13:15, Mertol Ozyoney schreef: This depends on what you are looking for. Generaly zfs will be more secure due to checksum feature. Having seen a lot of ntfs / fat drives going south die to bad sectors i'd not clasify them very secure. However ntfs and fa

Re: [zfs-discuss] fat32 ntfs or zfs

2010-02-27 Thread Dick Hoogendijk
Op 27-2-2010 13:15, Mertol Ozyoney schreef: This depends on what you are looking for. Generaly zfs will be more secure due to checksum feature. Having seen a lot of ntfs / fat drives going south die to bad sectors i'd not clasify them very secure. However ntfs and fat can be used nearly on ever

Re: [zfs-discuss] fat32 ntfs or zfs

2010-02-27 Thread Mertol Ozyoney
Hi, This depends on what you are looking for. Generaly zfs will be more secure due to checksum feature. Having seen a lot of ntfs / fat drives going south die to bad sectors i'd not clasify them very secure. However ntfs and fat can be used nearly on every os. And also you shouldnt forget

[zfs-discuss] fat32 ntfs or zfs

2010-02-27 Thread Dick Hoogendijk
On a -single- drive, what is the best filesystem to use: zfs, ntfs or good old fat32 I've a 500G sata drive lying around which I can (samba) share from a server (but then ntfs can not be used) or just format is with either ntfs or fat32 and attach it with usb2 when needed. I'm in doubt.. I've r