Re: [zfs-discuss] question about self healing

2007-01-15 Thread Kyle McDonald
Richard Elling wrote: roland wrote: i have come across an interesting article at : http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=2859p=5 Can anyone comment on the claims or conclusions of the article itself? It seems to me that they are not always clear about what they are talking about.

Re: [zfs-discuss] question about self healing

2007-01-15 Thread Richard Elling
Kyle McDonald wrote: Richard Elling wrote: roland wrote: i have come across an interesting article at : http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=2859p=5 Can anyone comment on the claims or conclusions of the article itself? It seems to me that they are not always clear about what they are

[zfs-discuss] question about self healing

2007-01-13 Thread roland
i have come across an interesting article at : http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=2859p=5 it`s about sata vs. sas/scsi realiability , telling that typical desktop sata drives .on average experience an Unrecoverable Error every 12.5 terabytes written or read (EUR of 1 in 1014

Re: [zfs-discuss] question about self healing

2007-01-13 Thread James Dickens
On 1/13/07, roland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i have come across an interesting article at : http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=2859p=5 it`s about sata vs. sas/scsi realiability , telling that typical desktop sata drives .on average experience an Unrecoverable Error every 12.5